2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0295-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolene–Monocryl-composite meshes do not increase microvascular Staphylococcus aureus adherence and do not sensitize for leukocytic inflammation

Abstract: Implanted Ultrapro meshes do neither increase microvascular Staphylococcus aureus adherence nor sensitize for leukocytic inflammation. Thus, we suggest that a mesh-induced increase of bacterial adherence in vessels of the implantation site cannot be considered as a primary cause for the development of mesh infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In four different microvascular regions of interest (ROIs) in the border zone of the scaffolds we measured leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction within host postcapillary or collecting venules (diameter: $40 lm). For this purpose, the leukocytes were classified according to their interaction with the vascular endothelium as adherent, rolling or free-flowing cells [18]. Adherent leukocytes were defined in each vessel segment as cells that did not move or detach from the endothelial lining within an observation period of 20 s, and are given as number of cells per mm 2 of endothelial surface, calculated from the diameter and length of the vessel segment studied, assuming a cylindrical vessel geometry.…”
Section: In Vivo Analysis Of Biocompatibility and Vascularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In four different microvascular regions of interest (ROIs) in the border zone of the scaffolds we measured leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction within host postcapillary or collecting venules (diameter: $40 lm). For this purpose, the leukocytes were classified according to their interaction with the vascular endothelium as adherent, rolling or free-flowing cells [18]. Adherent leukocytes were defined in each vessel segment as cells that did not move or detach from the endothelial lining within an observation period of 20 s, and are given as number of cells per mm 2 of endothelial surface, calculated from the diameter and length of the vessel segment studied, assuming a cylindrical vessel geometry.…”
Section: In Vivo Analysis Of Biocompatibility and Vascularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leukocytes were classified according to their interaction with the vascular endothelium as rolling or adherent cells (Roller et al, 2008). Rolling leukocytes were defined as cells moving with a velocity less than two-fifths of the centreline velocity, and are expressed as number of cells per minute, passing a reference point within the microvessel.…”
Section: Microcirculatory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurements, five postsinusoidal venules (diameter: ∼20-40 µm) fed by draining sinusoids were selected randomly. Within these vessels leukocytes were classified according to their interaction with the microvascular endothelium as rolling or adherent [15,16]. Rolling leukocytes were defined as cells moving with a velocity less than two fifths of the centerline velocity and are given as number of cells per minute, passing a reference point within the microvessel.…”
Section: Microcirculatory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%