2017
DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.focus1738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolapse of the Pipeline embolization device in aneurysms: incidence, management, and outcomes

Abstract: OBJECTIVEThe Pipeline embolization device (PED) is frequently used in the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms, especially around the carotid siphon, with generally excellent results. However, the PED has its own unique technical challenges, including the occurrence of device foreshortening or migration leading to prolapse into the aneurysm. The authors sought to determine the incidence of this phenomenon, the rescue strategies, and outcomes. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laser-cut mini stents have a higher radial force compared to flow diverters and consequently enable better flow diverter wall apposition. [ 10 15 ] We speculate that this translated into a higher occlusion rate in our series. Complete occlusion rates of commonly used flow diverters are reported to be around 66.6%–75% at 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Laser-cut mini stents have a higher radial force compared to flow diverters and consequently enable better flow diverter wall apposition. [ 10 15 ] We speculate that this translated into a higher occlusion rate in our series. Complete occlusion rates of commonly used flow diverters are reported to be around 66.6%–75% at 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“… The device was deployed along a fusiform or wide neck aneurysm, in which re-crossing of the freshly deployed device was deemed to be risky due to concerns related to stent migration into the aneurysm due to short landing zone [ , Supplemental Digital Content 2][ 11 ] After the device was deployed, it was realized that the proximal or distal landing zone was less than ideal, i.e., distance <6 mm or less than the diameter of the parent artery, which is not an ideal deployment [ Figure 1 ][ 14 15 ] The proximal or distal landing zones were around artery bends, leading to device malapposition, a situation that does not respond well to balloon angioplasty [ , Supplemental Digital Content 2][ 15 16 ] The distal end of the device was covering the origin of an intracranial major artery barely or partially, so that further expansion and apposition of the device would also lead to further shortening and subsequently unjailing of the specific arterial branch [ , Supplemental Digital Content 2] Previously placed endovascular devices which preclude the evaluation of optimal apposition (previously placed coils or stents) [ , Supplemental Digital Content 2]. [ 17 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations