1988
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-1988-012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projective Modules over Higher-Dimensional Non-Commutative Tori

Abstract: The non-commutative tori provide probably the most accessible interesting examples of non-commutative differentiable manifolds. We can identify an ordinary n-torus Tn with its algebra, C(Tn), of continuous complex-valued functions under pointwise multiplication. But C(Tn) is the universal C*-algebra generated by n commuting unitary operators. By definition, [15, 16, 50], a non-commutative n-torus is the universal C*-algebra generated by n unitary operators which, while they need not commute, have as multiplica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [19] Feichtinger and Luef give a detailed answer to when (5.10) holds in the setting of R n , see also [17,21] for related results. The FIGA was first proved by Rieffel [38] for generators g, h in the Schwartz-Bruhat space S(G). Rieffel's proof uses the Poisson summation formula and also holds for the non-separable case with closed subgroups in G × G; it is also possbile to give an argument based on Janssen's proof for (lattice) Gabor systems in L 2 (R) [30,31].…”
Section: The Janssen Representations Of the Frame Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [19] Feichtinger and Luef give a detailed answer to when (5.10) holds in the setting of R n , see also [17,21] for related results. The FIGA was first proved by Rieffel [38] for generators g, h in the Schwartz-Bruhat space S(G). Rieffel's proof uses the Poisson summation formula and also holds for the non-separable case with closed subgroups in G × G; it is also possbile to give an argument based on Janssen's proof for (lattice) Gabor systems in L 2 (R) [30,31].…”
Section: The Janssen Representations Of the Frame Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rieffel [38] proved in 1988 a weak form of the Janssen representation called the fundamental identity in Gabor analysis (FIGA) for Gabor systems in L 2 (G) with modulations and translations along a closed subgroup in G× G, where G is a second countable LCA group and G its dual group. Most other structure and duality results assume Gabor systems in L 2 (G) with modulations and translations along discrete and co-compact subgroups (also called uniform lattices), e.g., the Wexler-Raz biorthogonal relations for such uniform lattice Gabor systems appear implicitly in the work of Gröchenig [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from [51] that for irrational θ the projections in A n θ generate all of K 0 (A n θ⊗ O ∞ ) and…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We just determined the isomorphism type of the algebraic K-theory groups of A n θ⊗ O ∞ . One can also describe the elements in these groups using Rieffel's results in [51].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the same properties for θ = 0). So equipped C ∞ (M θ , S) is in particular an involutive bimodule with a right-hermitian structure [46], [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%