2018
DOI: 10.1137/17m1141849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projecting onto the Intersection of a Cone and a Sphere

Abstract: The projection onto the intersection of sets generally does not allow for a closed form even when the individual projection operators have explicit descriptions. In this work, we systematically analyze the projection onto the intersection of a cone with either a ball or a sphere. Several cases are provided where the projector is available in closed form. Various examples based on finitely generated cones, the Lorentz cone, and the cone of positive semidefinite matrices are presented. The usefulness of our form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, changing the Lorentz cone by an arbitrary closed convex cone K would lead to a more general concept of K-copositivity, thus our study is anticipated to initialise new perspectives for investigating the general copositivity of a symmetric matrix. In general, exploiting the specific intrinsic geometric and algebraic structure of problems posed on the sphere can significantly lower down the cost of finding solutions; see [1,9,10,[19][20][21][22]. We know that a strict local minimizer of a spherically quasi-convex quadratic function is also a strict global minimizer, which makes interesting and natural to refer the problem about characterizing the spherically quasi-convex quadratic functions on spherically convex sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, changing the Lorentz cone by an arbitrary closed convex cone K would lead to a more general concept of K-copositivity, thus our study is anticipated to initialise new perspectives for investigating the general copositivity of a symmetric matrix. In general, exploiting the specific intrinsic geometric and algebraic structure of problems posed on the sphere can significantly lower down the cost of finding solutions; see [1,9,10,[19][20][21][22]. We know that a strict local minimizer of a spherically quasi-convex quadratic function is also a strict global minimizer, which makes interesting and natural to refer the problem about characterizing the spherically quasi-convex quadratic functions on spherically convex sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are in a position to describe our proposed algorithm for solving (8). To proceed we first perform a change of variable θ mk = √ η mk γ mk and rewrite the considered problem with respect to the new variable.…”
Section: Proposed Methods a Problem Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example Let ε > 0 and K be a nonempty closed convex cone in n×r. Then the projection onto the intersection K𝔹F0,ε is given by (see Reference 47, Theorem 7.1) PrK𝔹F0,εX=Pr𝔹F0,εPrKX=εmaxPrKXF,εPrKXXn×r. Notice that in general Pr𝔹F0,εPrKXPrKXPr𝔹F0,ε (see Reference 47, Example 7.5).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%