“…Therefore, the Köppen scheme is used widely for climate change impact research with Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES; e.g., Gallardo et al, 2013;De Castro et al, 2007;Gao & Giorgi, 2008;Feng et al, 2012) and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios (e.g., Rajaud & de Noblet-Ducoudré, 2017;Chan & Wu, 2015;Zeroual et al, 2019;Mahlstein et al, 2013). A few studies have assessed Köppen-related climate-type changes over EA, merely focused on a relatively small area in the CORDEX-EA2 domain (i.e., Shi et al, 2012, andChan et al, 2016, for China;Yun et al, 2012, andLee et al, 2017, for S. Korea;Talchabhadel & Karki, 2019, for Nepal) using different emission scenarios, horizontal resolutions, and analysis periods. Since the differences in the projection domain (Bhaskaran et al, 2012;Leduc & Laprise, 2009;Žagar et al, 2013), horizontal resolution (Shi et al, 2018;Evans & McCabe, 2013), or model sensitivity to GHG forcing Sylla, Pal, et al, 2018) could be the source of the uncertainty in regional climate projections, it is important to coordinate experiments and assess the future projection from the same baseline (e.g., PI level).…”