2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2000)126:2(137)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Performance Control in Reconstruction Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanvido et al [10] and McKim et al [11] identified time, cost and quality as the effectiveness indicators for project implementation. Chan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanvido et al [10] and McKim et al [11] identified time, cost and quality as the effectiveness indicators for project implementation. Chan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the analysis units chosen were economic infrastructure projects whose risk management processes, and subsequent performances, are far from the desired (McKim et al, 2000;Flyvbjerg et al, 2002;Shenhar & Dvir, 2007). In this way, five cases have been selected and evaluated by the technique of synthesis of cross cases (Yin, 2015).…”
Section: /43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to McKim et al (2000), the cost of design is one of the many ways to measure the performance in refurbishment projects. The element of cost as an indicator in refurbishment project performance is closely interrelated with other performance indicators that could be used to achieve overall control of project performance.…”
Section: Cost Variance In Design Workmentioning
confidence: 99%