2003
DOI: 10.1002/tea.10095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project 2061 analyses of middle‐school science textbooks: A response to holliday

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design team focused on the topic of energy interconversion, that is, how the human body's organ systems, composed of specialized cells, work together to derive energy from food. Energy interconversion in living organisms is core to teaching life science, as can be seen by the prominence of this concept in Benchmarks for Science Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 1993), the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council [NRC], 1996), and state standards (Kesidou & Roseman, 2003). This concept of energy interconversion in living organisms was also the focus of the AAAS Project 2061 middle school curriculum evaluation study discussed above (Stern & Roseman, 2004).…”
Section: Part Ii: Curriculum Design Challenges and Their Design Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design team focused on the topic of energy interconversion, that is, how the human body's organ systems, composed of specialized cells, work together to derive energy from food. Energy interconversion in living organisms is core to teaching life science, as can be seen by the prominence of this concept in Benchmarks for Science Literacy (American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 1993), the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council [NRC], 1996), and state standards (Kesidou & Roseman, 2003). This concept of energy interconversion in living organisms was also the focus of the AAAS Project 2061 middle school curriculum evaluation study discussed above (Stern & Roseman, 2004).…”
Section: Part Ii: Curriculum Design Challenges and Their Design Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This created a database of citations of science ideas and epistemic practices for each material. This procedure resembles analyses described by Kesidou and Roseman (2003). Their analysis focused on science ideas, whereas we include statements of epistemic practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective view of SCALE‐uP requires an understanding of how the 6‐year study was initially conceived. The three curriculum units studied were selected because they had many of the instructional characteristics defined by Project 2061 Curriculum Analysis that should lead to more successful science teaching and learning (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002, 2003). Reading Figure 1 from left to right, note the number of instructional strategies in the first three curriculum units identified using the Project 2061 Curriculum Analysis.…”
Section: Overview Of Scale‐up Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also can be seen as research on the implementation and scale‐up of education policy (Spillane, Reiser, & Reimer, 2002). Implications of this work intentionally extend beyond the boundaries of this university/school district collaboration because the curriculum units chosen for study were selected by applying criteria developed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Project 2061 (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002, 2003), criteria intended to influence policy and practice. At the outset of the study, we hypothesized that curriculum with the instructional characteristics meeting Project 2061 criteria would be effective, but we also sought to learn if they were equitable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%