2009
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project‐based science curricula for meaningful understanding

Abstract: Project-based science curricula can improve students' usable or meaningful understanding of the science content underlying a project. However, such curricula designed around "performances" wherein students design or make something do not always do this. We researched ways to design performance project-based science curricula (pPBSc) to better support the meaningful understanding of science content. Using existing curriculum design frameworks, we identified the learner's need to "create the demand" for the scie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
81
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a question of the students being involved in the S&T processes used to solve the problem or answer the central question: scientific inquiry ( [19,26,38,43]); investigation ( [1,4,19,25,29,31,32,43,44]); and engineering design ( [25,29] The authors typically prefer the latter type of inquiry for PBSTL.…”
Section: The Students Are Engaged In Investigations or Design Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a question of the students being involved in the S&T processes used to solve the problem or answer the central question: scientific inquiry ( [19,26,38,43]); investigation ( [1,4,19,25,29,31,32,43,44]); and engineering design ( [25,29] The authors typically prefer the latter type of inquiry for PBSTL.…”
Section: The Students Are Engaged In Investigations or Design Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the authors consider that PBSTL facilitates a meaningful understanding of important science concepts and core scientific ideas ( [1,17,22,25,29,36,43,47]). On the other hand, they argue that this approach promotes the development of S&T skills and competencies: scientific inquiry, technological capability, design process and problem-solving skills ( [1,4,10,12,16,17,19,22,23,26,29,30,33,36,43,47]).…”
Section: Acquisition By Students Of Sandt Specific Knowledge and Competmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of discourse can be invaluable to foster the necessary science thinking during game play. Research has shown that students can get very distracted while doing a particular activity and forget to attend to what they are supposed to be understanding [21]. In a game play, this same stance can happen, particularly for students who have a game play orientation like Preston and who are very concerned with beating the game, but not learning along the way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The engineering students were able to achieve process skills and reported felt more motivated to learn actively engage the outside sources to accomplish the requirements of the Project [28]. It has been found out that project-based learning has important effects on students' academic achievement [32,33], and to students' individual learning [34], and students' motivation, their capability in problem solving and their learning achievement [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%