2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Damage Analysis of Web Crippling of GFRP Pultruded I-Sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compressive behavior of concrete was defined using the concrete damagedplasticity (CDP) model [32]. In this model, the material principal failure mechanisms were compressive crushing, tensile cracking, and loss of elastic stiffness.…”
Section: Materials Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressive behavior of concrete was defined using the concrete damagedplasticity (CDP) model [32]. In this model, the material principal failure mechanisms were compressive crushing, tensile cracking, and loss of elastic stiffness.…”
Section: Materials Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Significant strength-to-weight ratio, [82][83][84] rapid assembly, excellent corrosion resistance at relatively low maintenance costs, [84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] increased durability, 92 fatigue resistance, [82][83][84] nonmagnetic/nonconductive characteristics, 95 and an extensive range of thermal properties depending on the type of matrix and fibers used are just some of their various advantages. [96][97][98][99][100] The non-sparking nature of FRP elements (i.e. risk of sparks generation during the use of such structures is greatly reduced) allows their utilization in an extensive range of industrial applications subject to limitations on sparking.…”
Section: Building Elements and Complete Building Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous CDM-based simulation efforts around pultruded GFRPs mostly assume critical input parameters and only the best simulation results are shown. For example, Nunes et al (2017) and Li et al (2017) used solid finite elements to simulate buckling/crushing and transverse impact behavior of pultruded GFRPs, respectively. Almeida-Fernandes et al (2020a) used shell elements to simulate the evolution of damage in pultruded GFRPs subjected to progressive tensile fracture tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almeida-Fernandes et al (2020a) used shell elements to simulate the evolution of damage in pultruded GFRPs subjected to progressive tensile fracture tests. To highlight the challenge and uncertainty around finding suitable input damage parameters, these three studies apply vastly different fiber fracture energies of 2.38 N/mm (Nunes et al, 2017), 55 N/ mm (Li et al, 2017) and 100 N/mm (Almeida-Fernandes et al, 2020a) for similar pultruded GFRPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%