Abstract:Progress Test is an objective assessment, consisting of 60 to 150 multiple-choice questions, designed to promote an assessment of the cognitive skills expected at the end of undergraduate school. This test is applied to all students on the same day, so that it is possible to compare the results between grades and analyze the development of knowledge performance throughout the course. This study aimed to carry out a systematic and literary review about Progress Test in medical schools in Brazil and around the w… Show more
“…Therefore, it can be said that the progress test would be important to understand the performance evaluation process of medical students at each year, to analyze the development of students within a particular cohort, so it could be used as a tool for early diagnosis and interventions, as well as for comparisons between medical schools 1,14,24,26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress tests are comprehensive longitudinal assessments used to measure students' knowledge throughout a curriculum that allow, when properly designed and applied, observation of the individual growth pattern over repeated tests and comparisons of cohorts [1][2][3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, at Escola Paulista de Medicina -Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, the progress test was introduced in 1996 7,8 . This assessment has been carried out annually for students from the 1 st to the 6 th year of medical school at several institutions, either alone or in partnership 1,9 . Additionally, numerous studies have been carried out aiming to verify the students' performance on the progress test 7,10,11 .…”
Introduction: The relationships between the students’ performance on medical residency exams and progress tests and medical clerkship rotations are not well established. Objective: The objective of this study was to measure the correlations between grades on progress tests and clerkship rotations assessments and the medical residency exam and determine which performance had the strongest correlation with the final medical residency exam. Methods: This was a retrospective and longitudinal study with correlation analyses of grades on progress tests from the 1st to 6th year of medical school, the clerkship rotations performance coefficient (5th and 6th years of school) and the final medical residency exam in a cohort of students enrolled in a federal public medical school using factor analysis. Students who performed the progress tests from the 1st to 6th year were included. Results: Of 123 students enrolled in the first year of medical school in 2009, 114 (92.7%) performed the progress tests during the six years and were included. The average grades on the progress tests from 1 to 10 were 2.67 (1st year), 3.01 (2nd year), 4.19 (3rd year), 4.01 (4th year), 5.19 (5th year), and 6.38 (6th year). The average grades in the clerkship rotations were 8.32 (5th year) and 8.26 (6th year). The average score on the theoretical medical residency exam was 7.53 and the final result of the medical residency exam was 8.05. Factor analysis detected three domains with greater correlation strength that accounted for 76.3% of the model variance. Component 1 was identified as the coefficient of academic performance (CAP) 5th, CAP 6th and final medical residency exam grades, whereas component 2 was constituted by the grades of the 5th and 6th years progress tests and the third component comprised the progress tests of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th years. Conclusions: Grades on the progress tests, the clerkship rotations assessments and the final medical residency exam were correlated. Moreover, the performance during the medical clerkship rotations showed the strongest correlations with medical residency exam grades.
“…Therefore, it can be said that the progress test would be important to understand the performance evaluation process of medical students at each year, to analyze the development of students within a particular cohort, so it could be used as a tool for early diagnosis and interventions, as well as for comparisons between medical schools 1,14,24,26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress tests are comprehensive longitudinal assessments used to measure students' knowledge throughout a curriculum that allow, when properly designed and applied, observation of the individual growth pattern over repeated tests and comparisons of cohorts [1][2][3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, at Escola Paulista de Medicina -Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP, the progress test was introduced in 1996 7,8 . This assessment has been carried out annually for students from the 1 st to the 6 th year of medical school at several institutions, either alone or in partnership 1,9 . Additionally, numerous studies have been carried out aiming to verify the students' performance on the progress test 7,10,11 .…”
Introduction: The relationships between the students’ performance on medical residency exams and progress tests and medical clerkship rotations are not well established. Objective: The objective of this study was to measure the correlations between grades on progress tests and clerkship rotations assessments and the medical residency exam and determine which performance had the strongest correlation with the final medical residency exam. Methods: This was a retrospective and longitudinal study with correlation analyses of grades on progress tests from the 1st to 6th year of medical school, the clerkship rotations performance coefficient (5th and 6th years of school) and the final medical residency exam in a cohort of students enrolled in a federal public medical school using factor analysis. Students who performed the progress tests from the 1st to 6th year were included. Results: Of 123 students enrolled in the first year of medical school in 2009, 114 (92.7%) performed the progress tests during the six years and were included. The average grades on the progress tests from 1 to 10 were 2.67 (1st year), 3.01 (2nd year), 4.19 (3rd year), 4.01 (4th year), 5.19 (5th year), and 6.38 (6th year). The average grades in the clerkship rotations were 8.32 (5th year) and 8.26 (6th year). The average score on the theoretical medical residency exam was 7.53 and the final result of the medical residency exam was 8.05. Factor analysis detected three domains with greater correlation strength that accounted for 76.3% of the model variance. Component 1 was identified as the coefficient of academic performance (CAP) 5th, CAP 6th and final medical residency exam grades, whereas component 2 was constituted by the grades of the 5th and 6th years progress tests and the third component comprised the progress tests of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th years. Conclusions: Grades on the progress tests, the clerkship rotations assessments and the final medical residency exam were correlated. Moreover, the performance during the medical clerkship rotations showed the strongest correlations with medical residency exam grades.
“…A longitudinalidade dessa modalidade de avaliação formativa fornece uma medida única e demonstrável da progressão cognitiva dos estudantes 11 . Após cada avaliação, é possível reafirmar e consolidar conhecimentos e identificar lacunas de aprendizagem e pontos a serem melhorados 19 O TP possibilita que os cursos revejam suas matrizes curriculares e mesmo seus projetos pedagógicos por meio da análise dos conteúdos (gerais e por área) 20 . Fornece subsídios à instituição de ensino para a avaliação do modelo curricular utilizado 21 , por meio da identificação de como os conhecimentos dos alunos progridem durante a formação médica 6 .…”
Resumo: Introdução: A colaboração entre escolas médicas para a realização do Teste de Progresso (TP) vem sendo ampliada com o propósito de tornar-se um modelo de prática educacional. Relato de experiência: O núcleo de escolas médicas CIN1 foi instituído no ano de 2013, tendo na sua organização um coordenador-geral e coordenadores de cada escola participante. Realiza dois testes ao ano, variando o número de escolas participantes. O teste possui 120 questões distribuídas nas seis áreas (ciências básicas aplicada, saúde coletiva, pediatria, clínica médica, cirurgia/urgência e emergência, e ginecologia e obstetrícia) e tem seu blueprint baseado em matriz previamente validada. O teste é aplicado a todos os estudantes das escolas participantes, no mesmo dia e com duração de quatro horas. Aconteceu on-line em 2020 e 2021, por causa da pandemia da Covid-19. A pontuação total do estudante é calculada pelo número de questões corretas, sem a opção “não sei”, nem penalidades para incorretas. A análise é realizada por meio da teoria clássica do item. Os estudantes recebem a análise do desempenho comparativamente com a média obtida pelos discentes no mesmo ano e a progressão em relação ao teste anterior. As escolas recebem o desempenho dos respectivos estudantes, a análise da dificuldade e discriminação geral dos itens, e uma avaliação global do teste. Discussão: A implantação do CIN1 representou um grande avanço para as escolas envolvidas. A colaboração não se deu apenas sobre o teste, mas também para o desenvolvimento docente de forma conjunta. Impedimentos de regimento interno e custos podem justificar a variação na participação das escolas. Conclusão: A organização de um núcleo de escolas para o TP traz benefícios e muitos desafios. O aperfeiçoamento dos critérios de análises e feedback e a inclusão de estudantes na avaliação de questões são etapas a serem discutidas e implantadas. A utilização do ambiente virtual, de mais baixo custo, pode ser um facilitador para ampliar a participação das escolas.
“…É constituído de um número variável de questões, contemplando de forma ampla todas as grandes áreas da medicina: ciências básicas, saúde coletiva, clínica médica, pediatria, ginecologia/obstetrícia, cirurgia, urgência/emergência, ética médica e humanidades. Sugerese que as questões sejam de múltipla escolha e priorizem alta taxonomia, já que o processo de aprendizado envolve competências complexas 2,12 . A prova é aplicada a todos os estudantes em um mesmo momento, pelo menos uma vez ao ano, e permite comparar os resultados e analisar a evolução do desempenho do discente ao longo da graduação.…”
Resumo: Introdução: O Teste de Progresso (TP) é uma avaliação seriada e formativa, com conteúdo cumulativo desejável ao final do curso. O TP fornece um feedback do desenvolvimento cognitivo do estudante. Para o curso, faz uma avaliação diagnóstica do currículo e permite identificar potencialidades e possíveis falhas ao longo do processo de formação. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a evolução cognitiva de graduandos de uma escola médica da Região Nordeste do país por meio do TP. Método: Trata-se de estudo observacional, analítico, transversal, com abordagem quantitativa, em que se utilizaram os resultados dos TP das turmas de 2013 a 2016 do curso de Medicina da Universidade de Fortaleza. Foram incluídos os resultados dos TP de 2013 a 2021, descritos pela porcentagem da média de cada escore, calculado o diferencial de desempenho entre o primeiro e sexto anos, pelo teste T pareado e pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson para os resultados do sexto ano. O estudo respeitou os aspectos éticos e foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética da IES. Resultado: Foram incluídos os resultados de 361 estudantes (88,0%) de seis turmas que participaram do teste desde S1. Verificou-se um aumento progressivo no desempenho cognitivo global em cada turma ao longo dos seis anos de TP. A diferença de desempenho (DDO) da turma 2015.2 foi superior às demais (p = 0,047; R = 0,73). O grau de dificuldade das provas foi semelhante. Em relação ao desempenho global do sexto ano, houve diferença no desempenho dos alunos entre as turmas, variando de 64,3% em 2016.2 a 72,5% em 2014.2 (p = 0,003; R = 0,85). A partir do terceiro ano, a análise do desempenho mostrou-se crescente para todas as turmas. O desempenho nas áreas de cirurgia e saúde coletiva apresentou maior variação entre as turmas. Conclusão: O TP confirmou ser uma ferramenta importante para a avaliação formativa dos estudantes e para o diagnóstico do currículo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.