1996
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(96)06951-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress of erosive wear in spheroidal graphite cast iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to some previous researches, erosion were complicatedly in uenced by many affecting factors, which can be classi ed into 3 categories, (i) particle properties such as hardness or particle shapes of impact particles (ii) impacting conditions such as impact velocity or impact angle, (iii) target material properties such as mechanical properties or microstructure of target material [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . It is also reported that there are correspondent impact angle dependences for different kinds of iron and steel materials, the impact angle dependences usually vary according to hardness, particle diameters and shapes of impact [10][11][12][13] . In order to make it clear the impact dependence of ductile material, brittle material and spheroidal graphite cast iron, the erosion by repeated particles impact were simulated by means of single particle impact of 2D FEM models 14,15) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to some previous researches, erosion were complicatedly in uenced by many affecting factors, which can be classi ed into 3 categories, (i) particle properties such as hardness or particle shapes of impact particles (ii) impacting conditions such as impact velocity or impact angle, (iii) target material properties such as mechanical properties or microstructure of target material [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . It is also reported that there are correspondent impact angle dependences for different kinds of iron and steel materials, the impact angle dependences usually vary according to hardness, particle diameters and shapes of impact [10][11][12][13] . In order to make it clear the impact dependence of ductile material, brittle material and spheroidal graphite cast iron, the erosion by repeated particles impact were simulated by means of single particle impact of 2D FEM models 14,15) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to make it clear the impact dependence of ductile material, brittle material and spheroidal graphite cast iron, the erosion by repeated particles impact were simulated by means of single particle impact of 2D FEM models 14,15) . The results showed that the impact angle dependence of erosion can be re ected using the sum of equivalent plastic strain on the impacted surface 10) . However, the 2D FEM is too dif cult to simulate impact particle with all kinds of shapes except axisymmetrical shapes, but 3D FEM has abilities to build impact particles with complex shapes so as to explain erosion mechanism through Von Mises stress veri cation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of reports concerning the effects of microstructural constituents on the erosion behavior of cast irons [1][2][3][4][5][6], of which some are designed to investigate the influence of graphite [7][8][9]. From these studies, free graphite is generally considered nothing more than a notch except one report [5], and can therefore reduce the effective area in rendering resistance to irons under the erosion stream [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the major applications of austempered ductile irons is subjected to serious wear damage. Erosive wear, among other kinds of wear processes, of austempered ductile irons has attracted much attention [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%