1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(99)00045-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress of a half century in the study of the Luria–Delbrück distribution

Abstract: The Luria±Delbr uck mutation model has been mathematically formulated in a number of ways. This review article examines four most important formulations, focusing on important practical issues closely linked with the distribution of the number of mutants. These issues include the probability generating functions, moments (cumulants), computational methods and asymptotics. This review emphasizes basic principles which not only help to unify existing results but also allow for a few useful extensions. In additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
164
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of mutant stem cells and the degree of genetic mosaicism will therefore vary greatly between individuals according to a probability distribution called the Luria-Delbruck distribution (5). That distribution describes the number of mutant cells, M, in a population that grows exponentially from one cell to N cells (6,7).…”
Section: Genetic Mosaicismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of mutant stem cells and the degree of genetic mosaicism will therefore vary greatly between individuals according to a probability distribution called the Luria-Delbruck distribution (5). That distribution describes the number of mutant cells, M, in a population that grows exponentially from one cell to N cells (6,7).…”
Section: Genetic Mosaicismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations during the exponential phase of cellular growth in development cause the average frequency of stem cells with mutations to be x ≈ u e ln(N) (6), where u e is the mutation rate during exponential cellular growth in development. Although the frequency of stem cells that start with a mutation may be small, those mutations can contribute substantially to the total risk of cancer.…”
Section: Risk Of Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from settling a controversy over one of the basic tenets of modern evolutionary theory, the Luria-Delbrück experiment became established as the standard method to estimate mutation rates (Foster 1999). For these reasons, a variety of alternate formulations, extensions, and analyses of their basic model have been proposed over the decades (Zheng 1999(Zheng , 2015Foster 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting heavy-tailed mutant distribution was first proposed by Luria and Delbrü ck (1943) and has since been dubbed the ''Luria-Delbrü ck distribution'' (LDD) in their honor. Its first rigorous derivation was given by Lea and Coulson (1949), and many subsequent derivations account for different biological and experimental details (Armitage 1952;Bailey 1964;Mandelbrot 1974;Bartlett 1978;Stewart et al 1990;Stewart 1991;Pakes 1993;Zheng 1999;Kepler and Oprea 2001;Oprea and Kepler 2001;Dewanji et al 2005).Each of these derivations culminates in a version of the LDD expressed in probability-generating function (PGF) form. The great utility of PGFs is that (1) distributions can be easier to derive in PGF form, (2) distributions can be expressed compactly in PGF form, even in cases where there is no way to write down a general (nonderivative) expression for the individual probabilities of the distribution itself, and (3) from a distribution expressed in PGF form, the zero class and the moments of the distribution are immediate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting heavy-tailed mutant distribution was first proposed by Luria and Delbrü ck (1943) and has since been dubbed the ''Luria-Delbrü ck distribution'' (LDD) in their honor. Its first rigorous derivation was given by Lea and Coulson (1949), and many subsequent derivations account for different biological and experimental details (Armitage 1952;Bailey 1964;Mandelbrot 1974;Bartlett 1978;Stewart et al 1990;Stewart 1991;Pakes 1993;Zheng 1999;Kepler and Oprea 2001;Oprea and Kepler 2001;Dewanji et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%