2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in ultrahigh energy resolution EELS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In CL, there are energy dissipation processes that occur in the beam-sample interaction volume, where excess carriers are regenerated, and it is the recombination of these carriers that generates each CL photon [49], while in EELS, the energy loss from the inelastic scattering events in the beam-sample volume is directly retrieved from changes in the same beam. This favors EELS not just in terms of spatial resolution accuracy but also in energy resolution [50].…”
Section: Exciting With Electrons and Probing With Photons (Cathodolummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CL, there are energy dissipation processes that occur in the beam-sample interaction volume, where excess carriers are regenerated, and it is the recombination of these carriers that generates each CL photon [49], while in EELS, the energy loss from the inelastic scattering events in the beam-sample volume is directly retrieved from changes in the same beam. This favors EELS not just in terms of spatial resolution accuracy but also in energy resolution [50].…”
Section: Exciting With Electrons and Probing With Photons (Cathodolummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short wavelength of electron beam enables TEM to achieve an atomic resolution. Recently, the developments of aberration correctors and monochromators provide an exceptionally high spatial resolution (0.0405 nm) and a high energy resolution (4.2 meV) . A combination of aberration‐corrected optics, pixel‐array detector, and full‐field ptychography pushes the spatial resolution further to 0.039 nm on 2D materials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…experimentation, theory calculation and literature survey, with prior knowledge of materials themselves. The most common way to interpret EELS spectrum is to compare it with already verified experimental data (Riedl et al 2006;Lajaunie et al 2015;Krivanek et al 2019). However, it should be very careful because the reference data also could be obtained under different experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%