2019
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in the study of virus detection methods: The possibility of alternative methods to validate virus inactivation

Abstract: Virus inactivation validation studies have been widely applied in the risk assessment of biogenic material-based medical products, such as biological products, animal tissue-derived biomaterials, and allogeneic biomaterials, to decrease the risk of virus transmission. Traditional virus detection methods in an inactivation validation study utilize cell culture as a tool to quantify the infectious virus by observing cytopathic effects (CPEs) after virus inactivation. However, this is susceptible to subjective fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compartmentalization of target DNA improves the signal to noise ratio by amplifying target gene signals relative to other genes. 16 In normal bulk PCR reactions, inhibitors or excess background DNA (noise) can affect amplification effectiveness. In ddPCR, as a binary system, the absolute quantification is acquired by counting the number of positive and negative fluorescence droplets, however in qPCR, as an analog system, fluorescence signal increases proportion to the amount of replicated DNA.…”
Section: Droplet Digital Pcr Versus Conventional Qpcr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compartmentalization of target DNA improves the signal to noise ratio by amplifying target gene signals relative to other genes. 16 In normal bulk PCR reactions, inhibitors or excess background DNA (noise) can affect amplification effectiveness. In ddPCR, as a binary system, the absolute quantification is acquired by counting the number of positive and negative fluorescence droplets, however in qPCR, as an analog system, fluorescence signal increases proportion to the amount of replicated DNA.…”
Section: Droplet Digital Pcr Versus Conventional Qpcr Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR) is a type of digital PCR that employs one immiscible fluid (i.e., the so-called dispersed fluid) in oil (i.e., the so-called continuous fluid) to generate submicroliter droplets at kilohertz rates. 16,17 Nucleic acids, such as DNA, RNA, and complementary DNA (cDNA), may be encapsulated stochastically inside the droplets as reaction chambers. A small percentage of the droplets contain one or fewer copies of the DNA template (many of the droplets do not include any of the target DNA) and are then clonally amplified in each microdroplet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 Regarding the improvement of virus detection efficiency, due to their high surface area and ultrasmall size, NPs have been applied not only in RT-PCR methods but also other virus detection methods, such as an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). 24 , 25 Various kinds of NPs have been studied in the context of virus detection, including metal NPs, carbon nanotubes, silica NPs, quantum dots (QDs), and polymeric NPs. 20 , 26 Among them, metal NPs, metal nanoislands (NIs), magnetic NPs (MNPs), and QDs have been applied to coronavirus detection.…”
Section: Nanoparticles For Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomedicine is used not only in PCR setting, but also in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) [185]:…”
Section: Nano For Diagnosis Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%