2021
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.712502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and Challenges of Demand-Led Co-Produced Sub-Seasonal-to-Seasonal (S2S) Climate Forecasts in Nigeria

Abstract: This paper identifies fundamental issues which prevent the effective uptake of climate information services in Nigeria. We propose solutions which involve the extension of short-range (1 to 5 days) forecasts beyond that of medium-range (7 to 15 days) timescales through the operational use of current forecast data as well as improve collaboration and communication with forecast users. Using newly available data to provide seamless operational forecasts from short-term to sub-seasonal timescales, we examine evid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach shifts the user, in this context the conservation practitioner, from a recipient of forecast information to a participant in the knowledge and service generation process (Vincent et al, 2020), for instance, drawing on conservation practitioners' understanding of species' ecology to define relevant forecast thresholds and early actions, thereby increasing the likelihood that bespoke forecast information is ‘useful, usable and used’ (Boaz & Hayden, 2002; Hirons et al, 2021). For example, this could involve user‐directed iterations to the visualisation, communication or content of forecasts (Gudoshava et al, 2022; Hirons et al, 2023; Lawal et al, 2021) or applying user‐defined thresholds for specific decision‐making applications (Dione et al, 2022). However, it is also increasingly clear that the iterative co‐production process itself is extremely resource intensive (Hirons et al, 2021) and to be effective, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and evaluation need to be institutionalised as the operational norm (Visman et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach shifts the user, in this context the conservation practitioner, from a recipient of forecast information to a participant in the knowledge and service generation process (Vincent et al, 2020), for instance, drawing on conservation practitioners' understanding of species' ecology to define relevant forecast thresholds and early actions, thereby increasing the likelihood that bespoke forecast information is ‘useful, usable and used’ (Boaz & Hayden, 2002; Hirons et al, 2021). For example, this could involve user‐directed iterations to the visualisation, communication or content of forecasts (Gudoshava et al, 2022; Hirons et al, 2023; Lawal et al, 2021) or applying user‐defined thresholds for specific decision‐making applications (Dione et al, 2022). However, it is also increasingly clear that the iterative co‐production process itself is extremely resource intensive (Hirons et al, 2021) and to be effective, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and evaluation need to be institutionalised as the operational norm (Visman et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, through better understanding intraseasonal soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks during the West African monsoon, we can support efforts to improve subseasonal forecasts of the large‐scale circulation and help reduce the impacts of hydrometerological extreme events. Intraseasonal surface changes can impact crop yields, however regularly adjusting agricultural practices, such as date of sowing, and improving the communication of subseasonal forecasts can minimise losses (Sultan et al ., 2005; Lawal et al ., 2021). The atmospheric response to intraseasonal soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks has been shown to influence characteristics of deep convection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%