2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-007-0449-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmed cell death and stem cell differentiation are responsible for midgut replacement in Heliothis virescens during prepupal instar

Abstract: We have analyzed midgut development during the fifth larval instar in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens. In prepupae, the midgut formed during larval instars undergoes a complete renewal process. This drastic remodeling of the alimentary canal involves the destruction of the old cells by programmed cell-death mechanisms (autophagy and apoptosis). Massive proliferation and differentiation of regenerative stem cells take place at the end of the fifth instar and give rise to a new fully functioning epitheli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
96
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
9
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to fill this gap, we have recently studied the midgut replacement process during the larval-pupal transition in mature (5 th instar) larvae of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, trying to shed some light on the occurring cell death mechanisms. 4 Our findings demonstrate that the proliferation of regenerative stem cells is responsible for the formation of a new midgut epithelium, while the destruction of the larval midgut epithelium is accomplished by the combined action of apoptosis, as already reported by Parthasarathy and Palli, 5 and autophagy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In order to fill this gap, we have recently studied the midgut replacement process during the larval-pupal transition in mature (5 th instar) larvae of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, trying to shed some light on the occurring cell death mechanisms. 4 Our findings demonstrate that the proliferation of regenerative stem cells is responsible for the formation of a new midgut epithelium, while the destruction of the larval midgut epithelium is accomplished by the combined action of apoptosis, as already reported by Parthasarathy and Palli, 5 and autophagy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The presence of TUNEL-positive cells, and cells with vacuolated cytoplasm and pycnotic nuclei within the intrapapillary lumen may also be indicative of the occurrence of cell death (Kerr et al, 1972;Souza et al, 2007). In the insect gut, both apoptotic and necrotic cell death have been observed (Rost, 2006;Tettamanti et al, 2007;Rost-Roszkowska, 2008a, 2008bFialho et al, 2009;Park et al, 2009), while in some species necrosis accompanies apoptosis (Rost-Roszkowska, 2008b). Cytoplasmic vacuolization is strong evidence of cell necrosis, which is followed by cell rupture and discharge of the contents into the gut lumen (Rost-Roskowska, 2008b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytoplasmic vacuolization is strong evidence of cell necrosis, which is followed by cell rupture and discharge of the contents into the gut lumen (Rost-Roskowska, 2008b). On the other hand, apoptosis is characterized by cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation, followed by the discharge of apoptotic bodies into the gut lumen (Rost, 2006;Tettamanti et al, 2007;Rost-Roskowska, 2008b). Thus, chromatic bodies would not be rectal pads precursors, but fragments of dead, likely apoptotic, cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loeb et al (2000) have demonstrated that apoptosis is probably a normal method for biological disposal of older differentiated midgut cells of Lepidoptera larvae (Heliothis virescens) and that when midgut cell cultures are exposed to adverse environments, such as poisonous media, down-regulation of cell populations is induced by apoptosis. Nevertheless, programmed cell death and autophagy are natural and intense processes during larval development of lepidoptera (Tettamanti et al, 2007), which were considered during data treatment and analysis. Differences in apoptotic levels found in the larvae were not due to variability between larval stages nor the interaction between larval stages and sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%