Programmatic situation from the perspective of health vulnerability: Item database validation

Abstract

Objective To validate an item database to assess the programmatic situation of health vulnerability. Method A validation study carried out in 2021. Two scoping reviews were elaborated to identify operational definitions and, afterwards, meetings were held with the authors to formulate items. As a follow-up, the items were sent via Google Forms to specialists with expertise in the areas of health vulnerability or construction and validation of instruments. To validate the items, we used the content validity coefficient and binomial test, in addition to the intraclass correlation coefficient to verify reliability, all via SPSS® version 25. Results Seven experts answered with item evaluations in the language clarity, practical relevance and theoretical relevance criteria. Of the 88 items organized in the infrastructure and work process sub-concepts, most were modified following the experts' suggestions and had content validity coefficients greater than 0.80. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80 for clarity, 0.94 for relevance, and 0.92 for relevance (p < 0.05). Two items were excluded after the authors' meeting for consensus on the final item database and ten were merged. Conclusion and implications for the practice The items were internally validated and there was good reliability among the judges, enabling their use by health professionals to investigate vulnerability.