2016
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programa de treinamento auditivo em portadores de zumbido

Abstract: Findings showed no statistically significant differences between groups in the comparison between the moments pre- and post-trainings (auditory or visual), nor for the electrophysiological findings or behavioral assessment of the auditory processing and for the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, although some specific differences in the individual analysis have occurred.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were native speakers of rather different languages. As the only exception, Tugumia et al (2016) did not report impaired speech perception in tinnitus patients. Six studies contrasted speech comprehension under easy (e.g., no competing noise) and difficult conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients were native speakers of rather different languages. As the only exception, Tugumia et al (2016) did not report impaired speech perception in tinnitus patients. Six studies contrasted speech comprehension under easy (e.g., no competing noise) and difficult conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From an experimental viewpoint, in most studies the investigated group sizes allowed to make robust conclusions (all N > 14). The only study that did not find evidence for speech comprehension impairments is by Tugumia et al (2016). They used a Portuguese version of a speech-in-Noise test (Pereira and Schochat, 2011) as a validation of an auditory training procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the pathophysiology of tinnitus is still not fully elucidated and the heterogeneity of findings in the literature does not allow a breakthrough in specific treatments for all cases. There is a consensus among researchers about the need for studies with homogenous populations, or diseases with common aspects to decrease the risk of bias, increasing the chances to clarify the pathophysiology of tinnitus, and to provide human hearing comfort [14] [18] [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, the condition should be considered a relevant symptom in these subjects, because it may be a sign of future hearing loss or of an existing abnormality not yet detected by conventional methods (5) . Some studies have been conducted in this population to elucidate the possible relationship between tinnitus and the functioning of central auditory pathways (6) , along with high-frequency audiometry and suppression of otoacoustic emissions (7,8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%