Program Self-Evaluation for Continuous Improvement

Glasman, Naftaly S.; Cibulka, James G.; Ashby, Dianne

doi:10.1177/0013161x02038002009

Cited by 14 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although midlevel managers far outnumber upper level leaders and have an extensive impact on the performance of the institution, less has been available at the midlevel leadership level. Findings from national studies (such as Bogotch 2001, Glasman et al. 2002) demonstrate that leadership preparation and development programmes make a difference for new leaders at all levels, and that leadership training has a strong positive impact on institutions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leading change through an international faculty development programme

Lacey-Haun

Whitehead

2009

Journal of Nursing Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study findings will inform those interested in university policy and procedure on leadership training issues. The successful development of a self-sustaining leadership programme in which values of multiple cultures must be appropriately addressed has a significant impact for nursing administration. With the severe nursing shortage, health care institutions must develop cost effective yet quality development programmes to assure the succession of current staff into leadership positions. We no longer have the luxury of recruiting broadly and we must identify those talented nurses within our own institutions and prepare them for advanced leadership roles. This succession plan is especially important for the next generation of nurse leaders representing minority populations. In particular, nurse managers will find the overview of the literature for middle managers enlightening, and may find links to key resources that could be revised to be more culturally relevant for use in a wide array of settings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leading change through an international faculty development programme

Lacey-Haun

Whitehead

2009

Journal of Nursing Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, market pressures are emerging from alternative leadership preparation programs venues, providing incentives for university-based preparation programs to engage in self-evaluation activities (Glasman, Cibulka & Ashby, 2002).…”

Section: Market Pressures For Program Modifi Cationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, preparation programs traditionally have not actively engaged in program evaluation. Glasman, Cibulka, and Ashby (2002) point out that leadership programs actually have had numerous disincentives for program improvement, including a lack of universal agreement on standards for leadership, a lack of pressure from the policy community to reform leadership programs, resistance from within the university community, and market restraints that historically have discouraged academic rigor.…”

Section: Program Evaluation In Administrator Preparation Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature base related to portfolio analysis for program evaluation purposes is virtually nonexistent (Glasman et al, 2002), and there is a lack of agreement on the appropriate usage of portfolios for evaluation purposes. For example, Gredler (1995) and Lindle (1997) caution against their use as an evaluation tool while Harris and Arnold (2001) actively promote this purpose.…”

Section: Program Evaluation In Administrator Preparation Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Standards-Based Leadership Preparation Program Involvement Through the Use of Portfolio Assessments

Hackmann¹,

Alsbury²

2005

Educational Considerations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In recent years, preparation programs have been subject to intense scrutiny and criticism because they are perceived as being slow to integrate the principal's changing responsibilities into curriculum content and, consequently, continue to prepare aspiring administrators for outdated roles as top-down managers (Grogan & Andrews, 2002). In addition, market pressures are emerging from alternative leadership preparation programs venues, providing incentives for university-based preparation programs to engage in self-evaluation activities (Glasman, Cibulka & Ashby, 2002).…”

Section: Market Pressures For Program Modifi Cationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Educational Considerations, vol. 32(2) Full Issue

Young¹,

Mountford²,

Crow³

2005

Educational Considerations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Educational Considerations and Kansas State University do not accept responsibility for the views expressed in articles, reviews, and other contributions appearing in this publication. In keeping with the professional educational concept that responsible free expression can promote learning and encourage awareness of truth, contributors are invited to submit conclusions and opinions concerned with varying points of view in and about education. Educational Considerations is published two times yearly. Editorial offi ces are located at the

show abstract

Program Self-Evaluation for Continuous Improvement

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Leading change through an international faculty development programme

Leading change through an international faculty development programme

Standards-Based Leadership Preparation Program Involvement Through the Use of Portfolio Assessments

Educational Considerations, vol. 32(2) Full Issue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About