2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-019-02605-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic values of increased B7 family proteins in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients with aGVHD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in adolescent/adult patients were performed as previously described 17 . Details of the myeloablative allo‐HSCT procedure were described previously 18–20 . Humanized chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell generation and infusion were performed as previously described 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction chemotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in adolescent/adult patients were performed as previously described 17 . Details of the myeloablative allo‐HSCT procedure were described previously 18–20 . Humanized chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell generation and infusion were performed as previously described 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B7 family Prognostic Increased post-transplantation serum B7H1/B7H3 serum in haplo-HSCT patients was associated with grade III to IV aGVHD. [35] sIL-27Ra Prognostic The probability of grade II to IV aGVHD and NRM was significantly higher in patients with low serum levels of sIL-27Ra compared with patients with high serum levels of sIL-27Ra.…”
Section: Cd30 Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Previously published algorithms for severe aGVHD prognosis were usually based on peri-HSCT 'stationary' (i.e., not time-varying) parameters (including recipient, donor, and transplantation procedural characteristics) or 'landmark' analysis (designating a specific time point post-transplant for biomarker analysis) without modeling multidimensional time-series after HSCT. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] These methods' discrimination capability was limited, especially for patients who develop severe aGVHD later; sizable dynamic clinical data have already accumulated for these patients, and yet much of this new information remains unused. AUCs of models using only stationary parameters were reported to be ≈0.62, even when data from > 20,000 patients were available.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6]8 Attempts that tried to use biomarkers measured prior to the appearance of aGVHD signs to forecast severe aGVHD gave conflicting results. 7,10,11,13,14 ML research on dynamic risk monitoring has been active in intensive care, where blood samples and expert-rated scores are taken frequently and a plethora of devices are connected to the patient. 17,18 HSCT patients, however, have much lower data density and also higher heterogeneity in data collection than patients in intensive care.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%