2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1037964/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic forecasting of severe acute graft-versus-host disease after transplantation

Abstract: To anticipate critical events, clinicians intuitively rely on multidimensional time-series data. It is, however, difficult to model such decision process using machine learning (ML), since real-world medical records often have irregular missing and data sparsity in both feature and longitudinal dimensions. Here we propose a nonparametric approach that updates risk score in real time and can accommodate sampling heterogeneity, using forecasting of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) as the study case… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there has been growing interest in devising new computational methods for analyzing multidimensional phenotypes in diseases (for instance, acute respiratory distress syndrome, 30 type 2 diabetes, 31 aGVHD, 32 and sepsis 33 ). For post‐transplant immune reconstitution, Toor et al have developed the methodology of using logistic dynamics to classify the temporal profiles of the total lymphocyte count post‐transplant into three distinct growth patterns, 21 Koenig et al have explored the application of principal component analysis to measure the distance between an HSCT patient's immune status and the immune status of non‐hematological patients and the use of this distance for predicting overall survival, 10 and Mellgren et al have proposed to use reflected discriminant analysis to decompose post‐transplant immune reconstitution into two independent axes (one for cell normalization and the other for functional maturation) 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, there has been growing interest in devising new computational methods for analyzing multidimensional phenotypes in diseases (for instance, acute respiratory distress syndrome, 30 type 2 diabetes, 31 aGVHD, 32 and sepsis 33 ). For post‐transplant immune reconstitution, Toor et al have developed the methodology of using logistic dynamics to classify the temporal profiles of the total lymphocyte count post‐transplant into three distinct growth patterns, 21 Koenig et al have explored the application of principal component analysis to measure the distance between an HSCT patient's immune status and the immune status of non‐hematological patients and the use of this distance for predicting overall survival, 10 and Mellgren et al have proposed to use reflected discriminant analysis to decompose post‐transplant immune reconstitution into two independent axes (one for cell normalization and the other for functional maturation) 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the many differences between UCB-and peripheral bloodderived stem cell transplants, 29 the Composite Immune Risk Score is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in allo-HSCT in 2 diabetes, 31 aGVHD, 32 and sepsis 33 ). .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Most recently, the integration of multiple time-dependent variables into an ML model improved the prediction of acute GVHD (AUROC 0.78) in HCT recipients. 36 Although our final models update their predictions whenever new data become available, they use only the most recent laboratory result for each prediction. On large EHR databases, recurrent deep neural networks, for example, using long short-term memory (LSTM) units, have demonstrated high prediction performances utilizing entire time series as model input.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalized ML survival models for HCT patients refined prognosis at the time of HCT but exclusively relied on static pre‐HCT data as input parameters without adapting to complications occurring after HCT 35 . Most recently, the integration of multiple time‐dependent variables into an ML model improved the prediction of acute GVHD (AUROC 0.78) in HCT recipients 36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%