See original paper on page 1195T he observational study of Lee et al.[1] investigated the prognostic value of global longitudinal strain (GLS), subendocardial and subepicardial longitudinal strain (EndLS and EpiLS, respectively) in regularly treated hypertensive patients after a mean follow-up of 7.3 years. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, EpiLS was the only independent predictor of events and a cut-off point value of À17.57% distinguished the worse cardiovascular outcome in the population assessed. This is an important study, which confirms the prognostic value of GLS in the clinical setting and, particularly in the hypertensive population. Of interest, in the Coronary Artery Risk Development In young Adults study [2], among 2479 patients (average entry age ¼ 25 years), high cumulative exposure (over 25 years) to SBP and DBP was not associated with the reduction of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction but with lower longitudinal systolic and early diastolic strain rate derived by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography. Accordingly, GLS appeared to overcome the information provided by LV hypertrophy (LVH), allowing to identify a subclinical target organ damage, which could make possible a more targeted patient's management.The prognostic power of GLS in arterial hypertension is largely supported by the physiopathologic meaning of this parameter. GLS refers mainly to LV longitudinal function of subendocardial fibers which are early involved in cardiac damage of several cardiac diseases including hypertension. Young, never treated hypertensives had lower GLS than both young sedentary controls and athletes and GLS extent was associated with the degree of E/e 0 ratio, an estimate of LV filling pressure, independent of afterload and LV mass [3]. An early GLS reduction was also found in borderline prehypertension detected by ambulatory blood pressure [4].The novelty of the study of Lee et al.[1] corresponds to the differential prognostic value showed by EpilS and EndLS. In fact, only EpiLS stratified the prognosis, independent of the impact of confounding factors. EpiLS refers mainly to the longitudinal function of subepicardial fibers, whereas previous data explored GLS itself, without analyzing differences between EpilS and EndLS. This finding extends, therefore, the importance of GLS to the need of assessing also the degree of subepicardial longitudinal dysfunction. In arterial hypertension LV subendocardial fibers appear to be negatively influenced by presence and amount of myocardial fibrosis. However, the localization of the same fibrosis has a transmural distribution [5] and a recent observation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging highlights a prominent non-subendocardial distribution (90%) in uncomplicated hypertensive patients, the amount of fibrosis being also associated with GLS degree [6]. The increased afterload, despite influencing the overall myocardial longitudinal function, could affect in particular the LV subepicardial layer because of a preferential collagen deposition, able to entrap the...