2015
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in acute heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction

Abstract: In this clinical cohort of ADHF patients, eGFR as calculated by both the CKD-EPI and the MDRD-4 formulas offered similar prognostic information, irrespective of ejection fraction status, but in HF-PEF patients specifically, the CKD-EPI formula seems to improve clinical risk stratification as compared with MDRD-4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poor performance of MDRD-4 in predicting adverse events in HF patients was already established in the literature [19], although better results were demonstrated in postcardiac transplantation recipients [20] or patients with diabetes [21]. CKD-EPI provided better risk stratification than MDRD-4 in patients with HF after acute decompensation, although the AUC of the ROC curve did not overcome 0.64 in a study by Casado Cerrada et al [16]. Further studies revealed the better prognostic value of CKD-EPI as compared to MDRD when evaluating the impact of GFR on the overall survival rate of patients with HF [15,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The poor performance of MDRD-4 in predicting adverse events in HF patients was already established in the literature [19], although better results were demonstrated in postcardiac transplantation recipients [20] or patients with diabetes [21]. CKD-EPI provided better risk stratification than MDRD-4 in patients with HF after acute decompensation, although the AUC of the ROC curve did not overcome 0.64 in a study by Casado Cerrada et al [16]. Further studies revealed the better prognostic value of CKD-EPI as compared to MDRD when evaluating the impact of GFR on the overall survival rate of patients with HF [15,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McAlister et al [15] compared MDRD and CKD-EPI as predictors of mortality in HF patients, finding that CKD-EPI seemed more reliable than MDRD in predicting all-cause mortality at 3-year follow-up. Casado Cerrada et al [16] demonstrated that CKD-EPI was able to better re-classify patients with AHF (net reclassification improvement [NRI]: 6.78%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%