2009
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.161836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: Echocardiography is useful for risk stratification and assessment of prognosis after myocardial infarction, which is the focus of this review. Various traditional echocardiographic parameters have been shown to provide prognostic information, such as left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, wall motion score index, mitral regurgitation and left atrial volume. The introduction of tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking strain imaging has resulted in additional prognostic parameters, such as left vent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(96 reference statements)
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Furthermore, the diagnosis of ventricular remodelling is mainly based on the echocardiographic evaluation at follow-up. Our results revealed that initial decrease of LVEF and enlarged end-systolic volume may predict LV remodelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 Furthermore, the diagnosis of ventricular remodelling is mainly based on the echocardiographic evaluation at follow-up. Our results revealed that initial decrease of LVEF and enlarged end-systolic volume may predict LV remodelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic reliability of longitudinal strain is still under evaluation and it has been reported as a novel sensitive diagnostic echocardiographic parameter in some studies, while showing no exceptional importance in the others. 18,19,39,40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] However, the assessment of LVEF and WMSI has several limitations. The measurement of LVEF with 2D echocardiography is based on geometric assumptions used to calculate LV volumes.…”
Section: Gls Versus Lvef and Wmsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), and wall motion score index (WMSI) are well-established predictors of long-term outcome. [3][4][5][6][7] However, both LVEF and WMSI have some limitations related to reproducibility, geometric assumption, and expertise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Previous studies with patients with AMI had used initial CFR as a predictor of ventricular wall motion recovery by observing follow-up regional wall motion changes with the echocardiogram. 20 This study demonstrated CFR as a marker in evaluation of left ventricular recovery in patients with AMI. The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction measured by echocardiogram in this study was not significant, but improvement of CFR measurements was significant, implying that a subtle improvement in left ventricular function could not be differentiated from the use of a conventional echocardiogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%