1990
DOI: 10.3109/02841869009126543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Clinical and Histopathological Study of 143 Cases the Radiumhemmet Series 1936-1981

Abstract: One hundred and forty-three patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas treated at Radiumhemmet from 1936 through 1981 were reviewed. Clinical and histopathological findings were analysed by bivariate and multivariate analyses to assign prognostic factors. Mitotic count, menopausal status and stage showed to be significant predictors of survival. The series was divided into two periods of time and a significantly higher survival rate in the second period was noted for patients with stage I disease. Thirty-seven pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent studies, tumor size was found to be a prognostic factor for stage I disease, and both 5 and 10-cm thresholds were proposed (9,(19)(20)(21). Moreover, in our study, the mean tumor size was statistically significantly larger in the LMS group (11.88±7.79) than in the AL and CL group (p=0.008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In recent studies, tumor size was found to be a prognostic factor for stage I disease, and both 5 and 10-cm thresholds were proposed (9,(19)(20)(21). Moreover, in our study, the mean tumor size was statistically significantly larger in the LMS group (11.88±7.79) than in the AL and CL group (p=0.008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The contribution of other factors, including age at diagnosis, menopausal status and mitotic count, remains controversial [5, 9, 10]. An improved understanding of what affects CS prognosis would improve survival by facilitating the development of more effective, targeted therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation from cervical fibroid is difficult unless supported by histopathology and immunohistochemical marker. Stage, menopausal status, mitotic count, tumour size, age are known to affect the prognosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma, 2,3 however there are too few cases to elaborate the criteria for predicting prognosis in cervical leiomyosarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%