2017
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in spinal chordoma: An update of current systematic review and meta‐analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bootstrap analysis was used to test the robustness of the IRS as a prognostic predictor 45,46 . With combined data from the training and validation cohorts, the nomogram was constructed based on the IRS and previously reported significant clinical factors, 2,47,48 as well as the results from our multivariate analysis. The nomogram's predictive accuracy was determined by a concordance index (C‐index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was also applied to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the variables for LRFS and OS prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bootstrap analysis was used to test the robustness of the IRS as a prognostic predictor 45,46 . With combined data from the training and validation cohorts, the nomogram was constructed based on the IRS and previously reported significant clinical factors, 2,47,48 as well as the results from our multivariate analysis. The nomogram's predictive accuracy was determined by a concordance index (C‐index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was also applied to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the variables for LRFS and OS prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%