2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes According to Time after Direct Pulp Capping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
103
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,4,5 This aggression may be enough to cause impaired regenerative potential and loss of pulp vitality, depending on the previous condition of the pulp tissue. 25,26 Moreover, the loss of progenitor cells during this process has an aging effect that may reduce the regenerative capability of the pulp to withstand future challenges. 6 Therefore, the development of biomaterials that facilitate pulp regeneration of the remaining vital pulp tissues is desired to promote dental pulp self-repair, and regenerate dentin on exposed pulp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,4,5 This aggression may be enough to cause impaired regenerative potential and loss of pulp vitality, depending on the previous condition of the pulp tissue. 25,26 Moreover, the loss of progenitor cells during this process has an aging effect that may reduce the regenerative capability of the pulp to withstand future challenges. 6 Therefore, the development of biomaterials that facilitate pulp regeneration of the remaining vital pulp tissues is desired to promote dental pulp self-repair, and regenerate dentin on exposed pulp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common strategies for this purpose are pulp capping and pulpotomy, which consist of capping of the exposed living pulp with bioactive materials [3]. Because a capping material comes into contact with the exposed pulp tissues, the bioactivity and biocompatibility of the pulp-capping materials are important factors in determining the treatment outcome [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, all available studies show MTA to have excellent biocompatibility (Torabinejad et al 1995b;Pitt Ford et al 1996;Koh et al 1997;Torabinejad & Chivian 1999;Keiser et al 2000) with an exceptional sealing ability against microbial challenges (Torabinejad et al 1993Torabinejad & Chivian 1999). It can be concluded that current research indicates MTA is the preferable material for direct pulp capping and the rational alternative to CH in vital pulp therapy Cho et al 2013) (Fig. 4.5).…”
Section: Physiochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, some additives necessary for the hard setting of CH may also be toxic to pulp tissue (Liard-Dumtschin et al 1984). Therefore, MTA has advantages when compared to CH in pulp capping procedures due to better dimensional stability, sustained alkaline pH and equal or improved bioactive properties (Fridland & Rosado 2005;Sarkar et al 2005;Dreger et al 2012;Cho et al 2013). …”
Section: Comparison With Calcium Hydroxidementioning
confidence: 99%