Abstract:Radioembolization (RE)‐induced liver disease (REILD) has been defined as jaundice and ascites appearing 1 to 2 months after RE in the absence of tumor progression or bile duct occlusion. Our aims were to study the incidence of REILD in a large cohort of patients and the impact of a series of changes introduced in the processes of treatment design, activity calculation, and the routine use of ursodeoxycholic acid and low‐dose steroids (modified protocol). Between 2003 and 2011, 260 patients with liver tumors tr… Show more
“…In accordance to our results, Gil-Alzugaray [5] reported no relevant RILD in the treated patients with normal liver parenchyma, but in patients with cirrhosis or prior and subsequent chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These can be on the one hand complications b Fig. 2 due to the RE treatment [5,15,24,29,30] and on the other hand complications due to coil embolization associated with the therapy [1,19,25,28]. Peterson et al [24] performed a study in order to estimate the incidence of complications after 90 Y microsphere RE for unresectable hepatic tumors.…”
Purpose To evaluate the safety of radioembolization (RE) with 90 Yttrium ( 90 Y) resin microspheres depending on coiling or no-coiling of aberrant/high-risk vessels.
Materials and MethodsEarly and late toxicity after 566 RE procedures were analyzed retrospectively in accordance with the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). For optimal safety, aberrant vessels were either coil embolized (n = 240/566, coiling group) or a more peripheral position of the catheter tip was chosen to treat right or left liver lobes (n = 326/566, no-coiling group). Results Clinically relevant late toxicities (CGrade 3) were observed in 1 % of our overall cohort. The no-coiling group had significantly less ''any'' (P = 0.0001) or ''clinically relevant'' (P = 0.0003) early toxicity. There was no significant difference (P [ 0.05) in delayed toxicity in the coiling versus the no-coiling group. No RE-induced liver disease was noted after all 566 procedures. Conclusion RE with 90 Y resin microspheres is a safe and effective treatment option. Performing RE without coil embolization of aberrant vessels prior to treatment could be an alternative for experienced centers.
“…In accordance to our results, Gil-Alzugaray [5] reported no relevant RILD in the treated patients with normal liver parenchyma, but in patients with cirrhosis or prior and subsequent chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These can be on the one hand complications b Fig. 2 due to the RE treatment [5,15,24,29,30] and on the other hand complications due to coil embolization associated with the therapy [1,19,25,28]. Peterson et al [24] performed a study in order to estimate the incidence of complications after 90 Y microsphere RE for unresectable hepatic tumors.…”
Purpose To evaluate the safety of radioembolization (RE) with 90 Yttrium ( 90 Y) resin microspheres depending on coiling or no-coiling of aberrant/high-risk vessels.
Materials and MethodsEarly and late toxicity after 566 RE procedures were analyzed retrospectively in accordance with the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). For optimal safety, aberrant vessels were either coil embolized (n = 240/566, coiling group) or a more peripheral position of the catheter tip was chosen to treat right or left liver lobes (n = 326/566, no-coiling group). Results Clinically relevant late toxicities (CGrade 3) were observed in 1 % of our overall cohort. The no-coiling group had significantly less ''any'' (P = 0.0001) or ''clinically relevant'' (P = 0.0003) early toxicity. There was no significant difference (P [ 0.05) in delayed toxicity in the coiling versus the no-coiling group. No RE-induced liver disease was noted after all 566 procedures. Conclusion RE with 90 Y resin microspheres is a safe and effective treatment option. Performing RE without coil embolization of aberrant vessels prior to treatment could be an alternative for experienced centers.
“…Simultaneously, proinflammatory pathways are activated, resulting in endothelial injury with the activation of the coagulation cascade (57). Jaundice and ascites, in the absence of tumor progression or bile duct dilatation, are the main symptoms of radioembolization-induced liver disease (56,58). General risk factors for developing radioembolization-induced liver disease include prior chemotherapy, low tumor burden, high baseline bilirubin values, and cirrhotic liver disease (56,58).…”
Section: Clinical Outcome and Tumor Responsementioning
Learning Objectives: On successful completion of this activity, participants should be able to (1) describe the status of the current literature regarding new indications for radioembolization; (2) describe standard hepatic vascularization, identify common routes for extrahepatic depositions, and judge when "skeletization" of hepatic arteries could be unnecessary; and (3) appraise the different methods of activity calculation and recognize the strengths and pitfalls of pretreatment and posttreatment dosimetry.Financial Disclosure: Dr. Lam is a consultant/advisor for BTG International and a meeting participant/lecturer for SirTex Medical. The authors of this article have indicated no other relevant relationships that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest. CME Credit: SNMMI is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing education for physicians. SNMMI designates each JNM continuing education article for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits. Physicians should claim only credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. For CE credit, SAM, and other credit types, participants can access this activity through the SNMMI website (http://www.snmmilearningcenter.org) through July 2018.Radioembolization is an established treatment modality that has been subjected to many improvements over the last decade. Developments are occurring at a high pace, affecting patient selection and treatment. The aim of this review is therefore to provide an overview of current practice, with a focus on recent developments in the field of radioembolization. Several practical issues and recommendations in the application of radioembolization will be discussed, ranging from patient selection to treatment response and future applications.
“…The use of SIRT is less likely in the situation of non-liver-dominant disease. In a cohort study of 260 patients, it was found that REILD only occurred in patients who had cirrhosis or who had been exposed to prolonged chemotherapy (50). The type of chemotherapeutic agent did not impact on the incidence of REILD.…”
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with microspheres labelled with the β-emitter yttrium-90 (Y-90) enables targeted delivery of radiation to hepatic tumors. SIRT is primarily used to treat inoperable primary or metastatic liver tumors. Eligible patients have usually been exposed to a variety of systemic anticancer therapies, including cytotoxic agents, targeted biologics, immunotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). All these treatments have potential interactions with SIRT; however, robust evidence on the safety of these potential combinations is lacking. This paper provides current clinical experiences and expert consensus guidelines for the use of SIRT in combination with the anticancer treatment agents likely to be encountered in clinical practice. It was agreed by the expert panel that precautions need to be taken with certain drugs, but that, in general, systemic therapies do not necessarily have to be stopped to perform SIRT. The authors recommend stopping vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors 4-6 weeks before SIRT, and restart after the patient has recovered from the procedure. It may also be prudent to stop potent radiosensitizers such as gemcitabine therapy 4 weeks before SIRT, and restart treatment at least 2-4 weeks later. Data from phase III studies combining SIRT with fluorouracil (5FU) or folinic acid/5FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) suggest that hematological toxicity is more common from the combination than it is from chemotherapy without SIRT. There is no evidence to suggest that chemotherapy increases SIRT-specific gastro-intestinal or liver toxicities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.