2000
DOI: 10.3892/or.7.2.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic comparison between peripheral and central types of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in patients undergoing surgical resection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall 5-year survival remains very poor for lung cancer, and there is little difference in 5-year survival rates between patients with central and peripheral tumors (56,57). At the same time, survival is better for early-stage tumors which are V3 cm compared with >3 cm in diameter (58), and 35% of peripheral tumors in our study were V3 cm compared with 14% of tumors in a central location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Overall 5-year survival remains very poor for lung cancer, and there is little difference in 5-year survival rates between patients with central and peripheral tumors (56,57). At the same time, survival is better for early-stage tumors which are V3 cm compared with >3 cm in diameter (58), and 35% of peripheral tumors in our study were V3 cm compared with 14% of tumors in a central location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…31 The 3-type classification is not common but our figure for the central type, 31%, appears slightly lower than that reported by others, 41-47%. 5,7,30,32 The percentages of smokers in the examined cases were high (male 91% and female 60%), compared with 48.3 and 13.6%, respectively, in the Japanese general population, 33 in line with the fact that SCC of the lung is strongly associated with smoking. Funai et al (2003) reported similar rates for central and peripheral types, 30 and with division into only these 2 categories, we also found no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Association with consolidative obstructive pneumonias may result in "false" measurements of tumor diameter when they obscure the gross determination of tumor size, thereby affecting T1/T2 designation. One aspect of the histologic evaluation of squamous carcinoma that has been noted to resemble lepidic growth of adenocarcinoma is the ability of squamous cell carcinomas to grow on alveolar basement membranes and within alveolar spaces in a nondestructive fashion by solid cohesive aggregates of neoplastic squamous epithelium [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. This pattern of growth could confound the adequacy of size-based T staging for squamous carcinomas as it has for small adenocarcinomas of the lung [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%