2015
DOI: 10.4236/ijohns.2015.43031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic and Predictive Protein Biomarkers in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma—A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: Despite recent advances in clinical management of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), the overall 5-year survival continues to be poor. Consequently, biomarkers of treatment response will need to be identified. Proteomic strategies are one way to attempt to identify such biomarkers. Methods: The Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched until 1st March 2014 using the terms "larynx", "squamous cell carcinoma", "proteomic", and "biomarker". Articles which met i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One concerning problem in making an early diagnosis is the inability among professionals to detect relevant oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) or cancerous lesions at their most incipient stage (Lingen, Kalmar, Karrison, & Speight, 2008). From this early diagnostic requirement, several methods have been developed. One of these methods is the detection of salivary biomarkers, such as cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8) (Katakura, Kamiyama, & Takano, 2007), immunoglobulin G (Kwok & Goodyear, 2015), insulin growth factor, metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-11) , defensin-1 (Mizukawa, Sugiyama, & Fukunaga, 1998), carcinoembryonic antigen (Li, Yang, Jin, Cai, & Sun, 2017), carcinoantigens (CA19-9, CA128, and CA125) (Krishna Prasad, Sharma, & Babu, 2013), reactive nitrogen species (Bahar, Feinmesser, Shpitzer, Popovtzer, & Nagler, 2007), DNA damage marker (Agha-Hosseini, Mirzaii-Dizgah, Farmanbar, & Abdollahi, 2012), 8-OHdG (Kaur, Politis, & Jacobs, 2016), intermediate filament protein (Cyfra 21-1) (Nagler et al, 1999), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Gröschl & Rauh, 2006;Hu, Arellano, & Boontheung, 2008;Khurshid et al, 2018;Stuani, Rubira, & Sant'Ana ACP, Santos PSS, 2017). The detection of biomarkers in saliva is a diagnostic tool that is being used regularly due to its non-invasive and simple method, and it can be repeated systematically causing no discomfort to the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concerning problem in making an early diagnosis is the inability among professionals to detect relevant oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) or cancerous lesions at their most incipient stage (Lingen, Kalmar, Karrison, & Speight, 2008). From this early diagnostic requirement, several methods have been developed. One of these methods is the detection of salivary biomarkers, such as cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8) (Katakura, Kamiyama, & Takano, 2007), immunoglobulin G (Kwok & Goodyear, 2015), insulin growth factor, metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-11) , defensin-1 (Mizukawa, Sugiyama, & Fukunaga, 1998), carcinoembryonic antigen (Li, Yang, Jin, Cai, & Sun, 2017), carcinoantigens (CA19-9, CA128, and CA125) (Krishna Prasad, Sharma, & Babu, 2013), reactive nitrogen species (Bahar, Feinmesser, Shpitzer, Popovtzer, & Nagler, 2007), DNA damage marker (Agha-Hosseini, Mirzaii-Dizgah, Farmanbar, & Abdollahi, 2012), 8-OHdG (Kaur, Politis, & Jacobs, 2016), intermediate filament protein (Cyfra 21-1) (Nagler et al, 1999), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Gröschl & Rauh, 2006;Hu, Arellano, & Boontheung, 2008;Khurshid et al, 2018;Stuani, Rubira, & Sant'Ana ACP, Santos PSS, 2017). The detection of biomarkers in saliva is a diagnostic tool that is being used regularly due to its non-invasive and simple method, and it can be repeated systematically causing no discomfort to the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%