1996
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530260048030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis and Outcomes of Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

15
285
1
24

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,014 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
15
285
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality is estimated to be <1% among non-hospitalized patients [2,3]. However, the mortality rate rises dramatically among patients requiring hospitalization, especially among those who need intensive care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality is estimated to be <1% among non-hospitalized patients [2,3]. However, the mortality rate rises dramatically among patients requiring hospitalization, especially among those who need intensive care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…revious studies of outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia have focused primarily on early mortality following pneumonia in comparing outcomes across different patient groups, microbiologic etiologies, or types of care. [1][2][3][4] However, there is growing appreciation that for most patients with pneumonia, especially those at very low risk of dying, the time course of symptomatic and functional recovery is also of great importance. 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] However, there is growing appreciation that for most patients with pneumonia, especially those at very low risk of dying, the time course of symptomatic and functional recovery is also of great importance. 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las variables clínicas y de laboratorio medidas en la admisión al hospital asociadas a mayor riesgo de complicaciones y muerte en el seguimiento a corto plazo (letalidad en el hospital o seguimiento a 30 días) han sido claramente definidas [3][4][5][6] . En un meta-análisis que incluyó 122 estudios clínicos, los principales factores pronósticos en el seguimiento a corto plazo fueron la edad avanzada (mayor de 65 años), las comorbilidades, especialmente cardiovascular, metabólica, respiratoria y neurológica crónica, las neoplasias e inmunosupresión y la gravedad de la infección en la admisión al hospital o la unidad de cuidados intensivos 7 . La evaluación de la gravedad basados en variables clínicas objetivas o índices pronósticos como el índice de gravedad de la neumonía 8 y el CURB-65 9 ha permitido a los clínicos decidir el lugar de manejo de los enfermos, la extensión del estudio microbiológico y de laboratorio, el tratamiento antimicrobiano, la ruta y vía de administración [10][11][12] .…”
unclassified