2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702003000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open label, multicenter, non-comparative study of the efficacy and safety of oral gatifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a Brazilian study in five centers

Abstract: We made an open label, multicenter, non-comparative study to assess the efficacy and safety of oral gatifloxacin, 400mg PO given once-daily during 7 to 14 days for the treatment of adult outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia at five Brazilian medical facilities. Among the 86 subjects available for clinical evaluation, 84 (98%) were cured. The bacteriological eradication and presumed eradication rate was 98% (52/53) among the 44 (51%) patients who were bacteriologically evaluated. Drug-related adverse e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the frequency of gatifloxacin-induced adverse events was 15.7% and the majority of adverse events including nausea, headache, diarrhoea and dizziness were mild or moderate in severity, except for one patient who had treatment-related gastric soreness. This study demonstrates a safety profile of gatifloxacin similar to that of previous reports [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, the frequency of gatifloxacin-induced adverse events was 15.7% and the majority of adverse events including nausea, headache, diarrhoea and dizziness were mild or moderate in severity, except for one patient who had treatment-related gastric soreness. This study demonstrates a safety profile of gatifloxacin similar to that of previous reports [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…En la mayoría de la regiones, S. pneumoniae corresponde aproximadamente a los dos tercios de los casos de NAC en los cuales se efectúa un diagnóstico del agente etiológico [5][6][7][8][9][10]15,16,52,[54][55][56][57][58]210 . Además, H. infl uenzae y, en menor grado, Moraxella catarrhalis, como así también bacterias atípicas, están apareciendo como frecuentes agentes causales en varios pacientes de ciertas regiones 1,9,14,15,52,60,210 y pueden observarse eventuales diferencias en la incidencia de M. pneumoniae relacionada con la presencia o ausencia de epidemia al momento del estudio 9 .…”
Section: Etiologíaunclassified
“…Sin embargo, para el grupo 2a, el panel de consenso prefi ere la combinación de aminopenicilina/inhibidor de β-lactamasa como la opción primaria a ceftriaxona, debido a la potencial variedad y contagio de bacterias gramnegativas con múltiple resistencia a este último fármaco en el ambiente hospitalario 158 . De hecho, la prevalencia de estos microorganismos, especialmente aquellos que producen un amplio espectro de β-lactamasas, es extremadamente alto en América Latina 57,[159][160][161][162] . En un hospital de Argentina, el uso de amoxicilina/sulbactam o ampicilina/sulbactam para el tratamiento de pacientes con NAC internados en sala general, aumentó de 21% en 1999 a 78% en al año 2001, mientras que el uso de oximino-cefalosporinas de uso parenteral disminuyó de 47 a 6%.…”
Section: Grupo 2 (Crb-65: 1-3 Pacientes Hospitalizados En Sala Generunclassified
“…The diagnosis of melioidosis was not suspected in our patient since he had not travelled to a known endemic area. On admission, a vast range of pathogens causing this severe community-acquired pneumonia was considered ; in Brazil, the most common pathogens of (severe) community-acquired pneumonia include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella spp., Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Gram-negative rods, and respiratory viruses [26][27][28]. Based on the low prevalence of penicillin-resistant pneumococci in Brazil [28], the guidelines for the treatment of communityacquired pneumonia as provided by the Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases recommend third-or fourth-generation cephalosporins plus a macrolide intravenously as first-choice treatment for severe pneumonia [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%