1986
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90065-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progestins and oral contraceptive-induced lipoprotein changes: A prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with earlier studies of monophasic formulations, the change in total cholesterol seems to be lower in the present investigation (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). A study including the same two formulations as tested here, revealed similar increases in total cholesterol (9.5% and 4.9% after six months) and triglycerides (28% and 49%) and no significant difference between the formulations could be detected thus confirming the findings presented in this study (23).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared with earlier studies of monophasic formulations, the change in total cholesterol seems to be lower in the present investigation (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). A study including the same two formulations as tested here, revealed similar increases in total cholesterol (9.5% and 4.9% after six months) and triglycerides (28% and 49%) and no significant difference between the formulations could be detected thus confirming the findings presented in this study (23).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Low levels of HDL cholesterol apparently increase the risk of coronary heart disease in women and high levels decrease the risk (30)(31)(32). In general, EE raises and progestogens with androgenic properties (1 9-nortestosterone derivatives) lower HDL cholesterol levels (5,8,33). Elevations of both HDL and HDL-2 were seen in women on Marvelon@ and of HDL-2 with Mercilon@ at six months; the trend continued at 12 months, although not significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This effect may represent incomplete compensation for the increase in SV, or a direct effect of oestrogen on the resistance vessels; however, this theory remains controversial. whereas the opposite is true of progestins, and overall the combined OCP may increase LDL [18][19][20]. The female sex hormones also play a role in determining arterial compliance and some studies have reported fluctuations in AIx and arterial elasticity depending on the phase of the menstrual cycle [22][23][24], although the data are inconsistent [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%