2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progesterone vaginal gel vs. intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal support in IVF: a large, prospective trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates were higher with intramuscular progesterone compared with intravaginal progesterone. 11 However, more recent studies have resulted in conflicting conclusions [12][13][14][15] even considering 2 independent prospective trials conducted in the same institution. 13,14 There is currently no biological plausibility that either intravaginal or intramuscular routes of progesterone administration would be superior to one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates were higher with intramuscular progesterone compared with intravaginal progesterone. 11 However, more recent studies have resulted in conflicting conclusions [12][13][14][15] even considering 2 independent prospective trials conducted in the same institution. 13,14 There is currently no biological plausibility that either intravaginal or intramuscular routes of progesterone administration would be superior to one another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%