2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
578
0
19

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,015 publications
(752 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(49 reference statements)
6
578
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…As Teece (, p. 17) noted, “the literature on complements is both confused and complex.” For our purposes, we focus on two types of complementarities that can be expressed unambiguously in mathematical terms and characterize relationships between actors within ecosystems. First, we have unique complementarities.…”
Section: Towards a Theory Of Business Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Teece (, p. 17) noted, “the literature on complements is both confused and complex.” For our purposes, we focus on two types of complementarities that can be expressed unambiguously in mathematical terms and characterize relationships between actors within ecosystems. First, we have unique complementarities.…”
Section: Towards a Theory Of Business Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teece (), for instance, considers a different set of complementarities, which include some we don't consider, such as Hicksian complements, “when a decrease in the price of one factor leads to an increase in the quantity used of its complements in production,” or Hirshleifer (Asset Price) Complementarity to denote how innovation in one segment affects asset prices in another. He also considers technological complementarities, which occur when “the full benefit (or even any benefit) of the innovation cannot be achieved until some other, complementary technology (which, on its own, has only lower value uses) has been created or re‐engineered”—a condition that we consider to be very frequent in the settings covered by ecosystems, and as such, encompassed by either of our proposed categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most profitable business model may not be immediately apparent. A useful set of concepts for developing a business model around a core technology is known as the Profiting From Innovation (PFI) model (Teece, 1986(Teece, , 2006(Teece, , 2017a. In the PFI model, a fundamental requirement for profiting from an innovation is to take into account the appropriability regime that applies to the given innovation.…”
Section: A Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the business model (BM) dates back to the 1960s (Sahut, Hikkerova, & Moez, 2013); however, it is not a coincidence that its popularity increased as the economy was going digital. The BM literature started to become mainstream with: electronic business models (eBM) since the emergence of e-commerce during the 1990s; and digital BM, in the current digital economy (Blank, 2013;Osterwalder & Pigneur, 2010;Teece, 2018;Ibarra et al, 2018). The business model may be described as a system of interrelated and interdependent activities that determines the capacity of how the company does business with its stakeholders.…”
Section: Impact Of Digital Innovations On the Business Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%