2021
DOI: 10.1111/jifm.12128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profit‐tax relationship, business group affiliation, and external monitoring in china

Abstract: This study examines whether business group affiliation weakens the sensitivity of income tax expense to pretax income, while external monitoring mechanisms mitigate the effect of group affiliation. We find that this sensitivity is weaker for Chinese listed firms affiliated with a top 500 business group than for unaffiliated firms. Economically, our coefficient estimate implies that group affiliation weakens tax sensitivity to income by 5.2% in relative terms.However, we find that tax sensitivity improved in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although they are independent taxpayers, group‐affiliated firms are incentivized to shift income from high‐tax affiliates to low‐tax affiliates by exploiting their group affiliation to reduce group‐wide tax burdens. Several studies have provided empirical evidence supporting this view (e.g., Beatty & Harris, 2001; Gramlich et al, 2004; Lin et al, 2021; Park, 2018). These studies concerning tax‐motivated income shifting support the expectation that a nonfinancial group may utilize its financial affiliates to reduce tax burdens across the group.…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, although they are independent taxpayers, group‐affiliated firms are incentivized to shift income from high‐tax affiliates to low‐tax affiliates by exploiting their group affiliation to reduce group‐wide tax burdens. Several studies have provided empirical evidence supporting this view (e.g., Beatty & Harris, 2001; Gramlich et al, 2004; Lin et al, 2021; Park, 2018). These studies concerning tax‐motivated income shifting support the expectation that a nonfinancial group may utilize its financial affiliates to reduce tax burdens across the group.…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More specifically, they have an extensively interwoven ownership structure (i.e., pyramidal and/or cross-shareholding) among affiliated firms and make group-wide collective decisions to achieve group-level goals (Bae & Jeong, 2007;Jung et al, 2009). The complex ownership structures and group-level decision-making induce affiliated firms to strategically design and execute complex transactions such as intragroup transactions, cross subsidization and unfair support (He et al, 2013;Khanna & Palepu, 2000;Lin et al, 2021). In other words, despite the tighter regulatory environment, Designated Groups may find themselves in an advantageous position to avoid regulations and reduce taxes (Jung et al, 2009;Park, 2017).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, the role of the same network auditors in the FBGs is unexplored regarding EM in general and Pakistan in particular, which is an emerging economy. Furthermore, previous research has examined the role of audit quality in business groups and EM (Muttakin et al , 2017; Ocak et al , 2021), the board quality and business group affiliation (Johl et al , 2016), the role of the business group and listing status on EM (Kim and Yi, 2006), the role of ownership concentration and client importance on EM in business groups (Bhutta et al , 2016) and the role of external monitoring in group affiliated firms (Lin et al , 2021). To the best of our knowledge, no study in the literature has examined the role of same network auditors on EM in FBG-affiliated firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%