2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling of 19-norsteroid sulfoconjugates in human urine by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aliquots of urine (5–500 mL) were acidified (to pH ∼6.8) with 10 mM formic acid before extraction. The extraction process was modified from the procedures of Stewart et al and Strahm et al . The acidified samples were loaded onto an Oasis WAX plus solid‐phase extraction cartridge (50 mg; Waters) with 6‐hydroxychrysene added as an internal standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliquots of urine (5–500 mL) were acidified (to pH ∼6.8) with 10 mM formic acid before extraction. The extraction process was modified from the procedures of Stewart et al and Strahm et al . The acidified samples were loaded onto an Oasis WAX plus solid‐phase extraction cartridge (50 mg; Waters) with 6‐hydroxychrysene added as an internal standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, steroids in human biological fluids or cell culture supernatants have been analyzed by immunoassays; unfortunately, due to their physico-chemical properties and structural similarities, cross-reactivity has been often reported. Separation techniques such as GC-MS were therefore considered as the gold standard for steroid analysis with the main drawbacks being the time-consuming and chemically based sample preparation (hydrolysis/derivatization) that is not compatible with conjugated steroid analysis. LC-MS/MS based analysis in the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode is another standard in terms of sensitivity and versatility for steroid assays, with the main advantage of increasing sample preparation throughput . Several studies were published on H295R cells taking advantage of quantitative data generated using QqQ MS based LC-MS analytical methods. However, due to the targeted acquisition mode afforded by the MS/MS analysis (with either GC or LC as separation technique), the number of quantified steroids in these publications ranged from 1, cortisol, to a maximum of 21 steroids, , preventing further data investigation after acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] However, these approaches are generally limited either regarding their sensitivity or detection time range, sometimes both. Recent approaches based on targeted [9][10][11][12] or untargeted profiling [13][14][15] have been emerging for a couple of years to tackle this issue. The aim of such metabolic profiling, also known as metabolomic-based strategies, is then to reveal, identify and use for diagnostic purposes appropriate biomarkers permitting to sign such exogenous treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, other applications based on a targeted profiling strategy have been adopted. Particular applications have been described, focusing on phase II metabolites by LC‐MS/MS (selected reaction monitoring [SRM] or precursor ion scan acquisition mode) to screen for nandrolone or AED abuse in human and bovine, respectively. Phase I metabolites profiling by GC‐MS/MS was also developed to catch new biomarkers of steroid administration, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%