2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling antibodies to class II HLA in transplant patient sera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the measured MFI represents only the fraction of isotypes that are targeted by the applied detection antibody conjugate. Indeed, coexistence of IgM and IgA DSA has been described . In an own evaluation of 26 renal allograft recipients having only one HLA class I IgG DSA, we found coexisting IgM DSA in 31% and IgA DSA in 33%, respectively (unpublished data).…”
Section: Technical Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the measured MFI represents only the fraction of isotypes that are targeted by the applied detection antibody conjugate. Indeed, coexistence of IgM and IgA DSA has been described . In an own evaluation of 26 renal allograft recipients having only one HLA class I IgG DSA, we found coexisting IgM DSA in 31% and IgA DSA in 33%, respectively (unpublished data).…”
Section: Technical Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In an own evaluation of 26 renal allograft recipients having only one HLA class I IgG DSA, we found coexisting IgM DSA in 31% and IgA DSA in 33%, respectively (unpublished data). Independent of their clinical relevance, these antibodies—not monitored by the standard anti‐IgG pan —may have an influence on MFI, as they are competing for binding on SAB and thus may decrease IgG‐derived MFI . Moreover, the final level of MFI is influenced by concentration, affinity, and incubation time of the used detection antibody conjugate .…”
Section: Technical Challenges and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The cells were then treated with anti‐HLA‐I or anti‐HLA‐II at concentrations that ranged from 0.1 to 2 μg mL −1 , which are expected physiologic concentrations of circulating DSAs in patients .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The cells were then treated with anti-HLA-I or anti-HLA-II at concentrations that ranged from 0.1 to 2 lg mL À1 , which are expected physiologic concentrations of circulating DSAs in patients [24]. Upon stimulation with anti-HLA-I, TBM expression increased in a dose-dependent manner up to 1 lg mL À1 ( Fig.…”
Section: Endothelial Tbm Surface Expression Following Anti-hla Stimulmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Higher sensitization levels may cause the increase in the length of time spent on the organ waiting list. 22 Therefore, plasma renin activity (PRA) tests determine the organ transplantation probability of the patient whose presensitization level is low and cross-match test is found as negative before transplantation. 23 The methods used for HLA antibody detection has been developed in the last 10 years.…”
Section: Importance Of the Anti-hla Antibodies In Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%