Summary This literature review summarizes the evidence on the prevalence, determinants, clinical and economic consequences of nonadherence with immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplant patients. A literature search yielded 38 articles measuring nonadherence by self‐report, collateral report, assay, refill prescriptions or electronic monitoring. The weighted mean prevalence of self‐reported nonadherence was 28%. Nonadherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes, contributing to 20% of late acute rejection episodes and 16% of the graft losses (weighted means). In addition, nonadherence results in lower lifetime costs because of shorter survival, yet also in a lower number of quality adjusted life years. Consistent determinants of nonadherence were younger age, social isolation, and cognitions (e.g. low self‐efficacy, certain health beliefs). Determinants concerning the health care system/team seem to be underinvestigated. Because the evidence summarized in this review is based on older immunosuppressive regimens, further research should focus on prevalence, determinants and consequences of nonadherence with newer immunosuppressive regimens.

Early detection of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia and reduction of immunosuppression is recommended forBased on subsequent allograft biopsy results and peak BKV-viremia, patients were assigned to three groups: (i) definitive PyVAN (n = 13), (ii) presumptive PyVAN defined by plasma BKV-loads of ≥4 log 10 copies/ml (n = 17) and (iii) low BKV-viremia (n = 8). Clearance of BKV-viremia was achieved in 35/38 patients (92%) and subsequent clinical rejection occurred in 3/35 patients (8.6%), both without any difference among the groups. Patients with definitive Py-VAN had higher peak plasma BKV-loads and required longer time for clearance (8.8 vs. 4.6 vs. 2.9 months; p = 0.001). However, allograft function remained stable from baseline to last follow-up at 34 months (range 18-60) in all three groups with median serum creatinine of 1.6 mg/dl, 1.6 mg/dl and 1.3 mg/dl, respectively. We conclude that screening for BKV-replication and reduction of immunosuppression is an effective strategy to preserve medium-term allograft function even in patients developing definitive PyVAN.

SELDI-TOF-MS offers a unique platform for high throughput urine protein profiling; however, standardization of analysis conditions is critical, and both extrinsic and intrinsic factors must be taken into account for accurate data interpretation.

These results support the utility of SAFB for pretransplant risk assessment and organ allocation, and suggest that improvement of the positive predictive value of HLA-DSA defined by SAFB will require an enhanced definition of pathogenic factors of HLA-DSA.

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a common viral infection of renal allografts, with biopsy-proven incidence of approximately 5%. A generally accepted morphologic classification of definitive PVN that groups histologic changes, reflects clinical presentation, and facilitates comparative outcome analyses is lacking. Here, we report a morphologic classification scheme for definitive PVN from the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy, comprising nine transplant centers in the United States and Europe. This study represents the largest systematic analysis of definitive PVN undertaken thus far. In a retrospective fashion, clinical data were collected from 192 patients and correlated with morphologic findings from index biopsies at the time of initial PVN diagnosis. Histologic features were centrally scored according to Banff guidelines, including additional semiquantitative histologic assessment of intrarenal polyomavirus replication/load levels. In-depth statistical analyses, including mixed effects repeated measures models and logistic regression, revealed two independent histologic variables to be most significantly associated with clinical presentation: intrarenal polyomavirus load levels and Banff interstitial fibrosis ci scores. These two statistically determined histologic variables formed the basis for the definition of three PVN classes that correlated strongest with three clinical parameters: presentation at time of index biopsy, serum creatinine levels/renal function over 24 months of follow-up, and graft failure. The PVN classes 1-3 as described here can easily be recognized in routine renal biopsy specimens. We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, especially at the time of index diagnosis, and in scientific studies to improve comparative data analysis.

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the primary cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) in kid-

Abstract. At present, the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection requires a renal biopsy. Clinical management of renal transplant patients would be improved by the development of noninvasive markers of rejection that can be measured frequently. This study sought to determine whether such candidate proteins can be detected in urine using mass spectrometry. Four patient groups were rigidly defined on the basis of allograft function, clinical course, and allograft biopsy result: acute clinical rejection group (n ϭ 18), stable transplant group (n ϭ 22), acute tubular necrosis group (n ϭ 5), and recurrent (or de novo) glomerulopathy group (n ϭ 5). Urines collected the day of the allograft biopsy were analyzed by mass spectrometry. As a normal control group, 28 urines from healthy individuals were analyzed the identical manner, as well as 5 urines from non-transplanted patients with lower urinary tract infection. Furthermore, sequential urine analysis was performed in patients in the acute clinical rejection and the stable transplant group. Three prominent peak clusters were found in 17 of 18 patients (94%) with acute rejection episodes, but only in 4 of 22 patients (18%) without clinical and histologic evidence for rejection and in 0 of 28 normal controls (P Ͻ 0.001). In addition, the presence or absence of these peak clusters correlated with the clinicopathologic course in most patients. Acute tubular necrosis, glomerulopathies, lower urinary tract infection, and cytomegalovirus viremia were not confounding variables. In conclusion, proteomic technology together with stringent definition of patient groups can detect urine proteins associated with acute renal allograft rejection. Identification of these proteins may prove useful as non-invasive diagnostic markers for rejection and the development of novel therapeutic agents.

Our aim is to develop noninvasive tests to monitor the renal allograft posttransplant. Previously, we have reported that an unbiased proteomic-based approach can detect urine protein peaks associated with acute tubulointerstitial renal allograft rejection. Identification of these proteins peaks by mass spectrometry demonstrated that they all derive from nontryptic cleaved forms of b 2-microglobulin. In vitro experiments showed that cleavage of intact b 2-microglobulin requires a urine pH < 6 and the presence of aspartic proteases. Patients with acute tubulointerstitial rejection had lower urine pH than stable transplants and healthy individuals. In addition, they had higher amounts of aspartic proteases and intact b 2-microglobulin in urine. These factors ultimately lead to increased amounts of cleaved urinary b 2-microglobulin. Cleaved b 2-microglobulin as an indicator of acute tubular injury may become a useful tool for noninvasive monitoring of renal allografts.