2017
DOI: 10.26711/007577152790009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of Cognitive Flexibility in Arithmetic Reasoning: A Cross-Country Comparison of German and American Elementary Students

Abstract: Flexibility in performing mental calculations has become an important topic for research in mathematics education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Which aspects can be promoted in the development of an understanding of numbers and arithmetic with the help of the fingers, which cannot? While neuroscientific and cognitive-psychological studies often seem to focus exclusively on the correctness of the result (e g., Käser et al, 2013 ), the declared aim of mathematics education is the development of flexible mental calculation and thus the focus on diverse solution paths from the very beginning (e g., Selter, 2000 ; Anghileri, 2001 ; Baroody, 2003 ; Rathgeb-Schnierer and Green, 2017 ).…”
Section: Beyond Cardinal and Ordinal Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which aspects can be promoted in the development of an understanding of numbers and arithmetic with the help of the fingers, which cannot? While neuroscientific and cognitive-psychological studies often seem to focus exclusively on the correctness of the result (e g., Käser et al, 2013 ), the declared aim of mathematics education is the development of flexible mental calculation and thus the focus on diverse solution paths from the very beginning (e g., Selter, 2000 ; Anghileri, 2001 ; Baroody, 2003 ; Rathgeb-Schnierer and Green, 2017 ).…”
Section: Beyond Cardinal and Ordinal Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observou-se também que todos os recursos do raciocínio por características do problema foram usados pelos dois anos escolares, com menores proporções no 2º ano e maiores no 4º ano, ou seja, de modo geral, estes recursos cognitivos, ou ações mentais, já estavam disponíveis para as crianças mais novas e o seu uso foi ampliado pelas crianças mais velhas (Caviola et al, 2018;McMullen et al, 2016). Acredita-se que tal achado esteja relacionado ao nível de experiência numérica dos estudantes (Rathgeb-Schnierer & Green, 2017). Embora o conhecimento numérico tenha se destacado nos resultados, os procedimentos de solução também evidenciaram as fragilidades deste conhecimento nos estudantes brasileiros, pois houve alta proporção de contagem, considerada a mais imatura das estratégias de cálculo (Threfall, 2002).…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified