2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile distance method—a multi-attribute decision making approach for information system investments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard financial accounting methods are used mainly to support financial analysis of costs and benefits. The non-financial stream seeks to be more inclusive, such as ranking and scoring techniques, which can include a wider range of measures often consider subjective and perceptual views (Bernroider & Stix, 2006;Saaty, 1980). Many procedural frameworks have a rational root and re-visit the classic "intelligence", "design" and "choice" phases (Simon, 1960).…”
Section: Technological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard financial accounting methods are used mainly to support financial analysis of costs and benefits. The non-financial stream seeks to be more inclusive, such as ranking and scoring techniques, which can include a wider range of measures often consider subjective and perceptual views (Bernroider & Stix, 2006;Saaty, 1980). Many procedural frameworks have a rational root and re-visit the classic "intelligence", "design" and "choice" phases (Simon, 1960).…”
Section: Technological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the weighted sum method the overall suitability of each alternative is thereby calculated by averaging the score of each alternative with respect to every attribute with the corresponding importance weighting. Other more contemporary approaches in operations research to aggregation can be supported by Data Envelopment Analysis (Cooper, Seiford, & Tone, 2000), or the Profile Distance Method (Edward W. N. Bernroider & Stix, 2006). In business practice important preconditions of additive value models and aggregation are regularly violated (Edward W.N.…”
Section: Additive Value Models and Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of formality makes it difficult to accept and also understand statements about the value side and its connection with the cost side. The crucial question that business management faces about the contribution IT makes in the businesses' value chain is currently insufficiently answered by simple cost-benefit analyses and classic net present value considerations (Edward W. N. Bernroider & Stix, 2006). Those evaluations focus extensively on tangible benefits, mostly neglecting intangible or strategic effects, as well as "soft" in-house factors related to employees and stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few DEA applications focus on transport services, especially to evaluate performance of urban transport [30,31], container ports [32] and airports [33]. In some papers DEA is applied within an evaluation process in order to rank different alternative scenarios [34][35][36][37]. Variation on time of efficiency measures is considered in different approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%