2017
DOI: 10.19166/pji.v13i2.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profil Pemecahan Masalah Aljabar Berpandu Pada Taksonomi SOLO Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Makale Tana Toraja [A Profile of Guided Algebra Problem Solving Using the SOLO Taxonomy and the Cognitive Conceptual Tempo Style of Students at the SMA Negeri 1 School In Makale, Tana Toraja]

Abstract: The objective of this research was to discover the process used in solving a superitem test which consisted of 4 stages according to the SOLO (Structure of Learning Outcomes) Taxonomy, namely unistuctural, multistructural, relational, and extended abstract, and reviewed using the cognitive impulsive and reflective style. The research was qualitative research. The main instrument of the research was the researcher himself guided by a superitem test, an impulsive-reflective cognitive test namely MFFT (Matching F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the limitations found in the research of Firmasari, Sukestiyarno, and Mariani (2013) were the lack of reliability in that book. Research conducted by Appulembang (2017) was able to express the thinking process of students in completing the Superitem test. The limitations of the research carried out by the Appulembang (2017) were the conventional forms of testing, which only relied on printed paper distributed to students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the limitations found in the research of Firmasari, Sukestiyarno, and Mariani (2013) were the lack of reliability in that book. Research conducted by Appulembang (2017) was able to express the thinking process of students in completing the Superitem test. The limitations of the research carried out by the Appulembang (2017) were the conventional forms of testing, which only relied on printed paper distributed to students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ia langsung meyakini bahwa hasil perhitungan dan informasi-informasi yang sudah ia tuliskan sudah sesuai dengan kebutuhan penyelesaian masalah. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa faktor pendukung keputusan dari S2 tidak berdasarkan atas data tetapi lebih didukung oleh keyakinan hati yang dimiliki (Appulembang, 2017).…”
Section: Profile Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Barisan Dan Deret Secara...unclassified
“…In contrast, the thinking profile of subjects with low motivation to learn mathematics is at the level of uni-structural, multi-structural, and relational thinking. Appulembang (2017) states that the first subject of impulsive cognitive style and reflective shows a tendency to solve problems at an abstract level which is extended to one-variable linear equations and two-variable linear equations. The second subject of impulsive cognitive style in problem-solving linear equations of two variables showed uni-structural and relational thinking tendencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%