Profil Kemampuan Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi Dalam Mengomunikasikan Hasil Praktikum Fisiologi Hewan

Abstract

AbstrakMasalah pokok dalam penelitian ini adalah menganalisis profil kemampuan komunikasi mahasiswa calon guru Biologi dalam menyusun laporan praktikum mata kuliah Fisiologi Hewan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Skor laporan praktikum direratakan lalu dianalisa secara deskriptif. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan calon guru Biologi dalam mengomunikasikan hasil praktikum dikategorikan cukup dan cenderung mengalami peningkatan. Rerata skor laporan praktikum 1, 2, dan 3, secara berturut-turut sebesar 1,72; 2,03; dan 2,31. Selain itu, aspek penilaian "terdapat ketepatan sistematika penulisan laporan praktikum" mengalami peningkatan. Penyusunan laporan praktikum sudah sesuai dengan sistematika penulisan yang baik. Aspek penilaian "kemampuan mengolah data temuan secara tepat" dan "relevansi penggunaan teori dalam menganalisis data temuan" juga mengalami peningkatan, dengan rerata skor masing-masing adalah 1,10 menjadi 2,27 dan 1,27 menjadi 2,17. Jadi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan komunikasi calon guru Biologi dalam penyusunan laporan praktikum mata kuliah Fisiologi Hewan dikategorikan cukup. Pemberian feedback dinilai efektif dalam peningkatan kemampuan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Kemampuan Komunikasi, Mahasiswa, Biologi AbstractThe main problem in this research is to analyze the profile communications skill of Biology's student teachers in preparing the report practicum course on Animal Physiology. The research method used is descriptive quantitative method. Data (score of practical reports) is averaged then analyzed descriptively. The results are the ability of prospective biology teacher in communicating the practical results fall into the category enough and tends to increase. Mean score of practical report 1, 2, and 3 respectively 1.72; 2.03; 2.31. In addition, aspects of assessment "are precision systematic writing lab report" increased. Preparation of practical reports are in accordance with the systematics of good writing. Aspects of assessment "ability to process data accurately findings" and "relevance of theories in analyzing the data findings" also increased, with the average score of each is 1.10 to 2.27 and 1.27 to 2.17. So it can be concluded that a prospective biology teacher communication skills in the preparation of practical reports on subjects Physiology categorized enough. Giving feedback is considered effective in improving the ability of it.

Kemampuan Mahasiswa Menulis Laporan Hasil Praktikum pada Matakuliah Biologi Air Tawar

“…Menurut Kholifudin (2014) kemampuan menuliskan laporan hasil praktikum sangat dibutuhkan oleh mahasiswa agar apa yang telah diperoleh dapat tersampaikan kepada orang lain dan sebagai bentuk desiminasi. Akan tetapi, berdasarkan hasil penelitian (Astuti & Suciati, 2017)…”

Profile of Teaching Materials Environment Biology and Ability Pre-service Biology Teacher to Communicate Laboratory Report

“…In the third internship, the preservice teacher knew the weaknesses of the report prepared by the feedback from the lecturers as a basis for consideration and experience to communicate the results in the laboratory report. According to [15], efforts are being made to improve the pre-service teacher' communication skills through written language through feedback so they can help pre-service teacher through the zone of proximal development to reach the level of intellectual development. Consulting a lecturer will strengthen the relationship between the concepts pre-service teacher have received.…”

“…The assessment section consists of criteria for the experimental report/preliminary study describing pre-service teacher' ability to communicate the results of the laboratory report. The criteria for the assessment of the internship by [15] include: 1) clarity of practical work processes; 2) the ability to process findings correctly; 3) accuracy of the analysis of the findings data; 4) consistency with goals, outcomes and conclusions; 5) relevance of the theory in the analysis of entrepreneurial data; 6) systemic accuracy of the report; 7) Timeliness of reporting. The evaluation of laboratory reports was descriptively analyzed by means of a number of evaluation scales (1-3) using communication capability indicators.…”

“…In addition, hands-on activities can give pre-service teacher the ability to argue or communicate in practical reports [6]. Therefore, communication skills are part of the scientific process competencies that must be acquired and trained by biology education pre-service teacher to develop the pre-service teacher ' potential in a course [15].…”

“…According to Kholifudin, (2014), the ability to communicate the results of the placement/experiment is required by the pre-service teacher so that what they have achieved can be passed on to others and as a form of dissemination. However, based on the results of the study [15] from several indicators, the report's ability to communicate is still considered sufficient in the report and needs to be trained to draw conclusions.…”