Professional Growth of a Young Scientist: Scarce Support Resources

Drugova, Elena; Andrakhanov, А. А.; Bolbasova, L. А.; Korichin, D. A.

doi:10.15826/umpa.2017.02.028

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(прирост составил 9,4 %). Показатель России, занимающей 5-ю позицию 7 , имеет неустойчивую динамику: с 2015 г. наблюдается снижение данного показателя, и к 2017 г. общее сокращение исследователей по отношению к 2012 г. составило 7,3 %. В Корее количество исследователей увеличивалось на протяжении шести лет, и к 2017 г. прирост составил 21,3 %.…”

Section: International Experience In the Integration Of Educationunclassified

“…URL: https://tass.ru/ mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/5967509 (дата обращения 09.04.2020). 7 По данным ЮНЕСКО, 3-е место занимает Япония, 4-е -Германия. Обзор литературы В настоящее время среди научной общественности большое внимание уделяется вопросам выявления молодых исследователей и их поддержке, а также совершенствованию инструментов реализации научного потенциала молодых ученых.…”

Section: International Experience In the Integration Of Educationunclassified

“…А. А. Зуев, А. А. Осмоловская, А. Ю. Внутских представили обобщенную характеристику мер поддержки, предоставляемых молодым ученым в России, и указали на важность не только развития старых и создания новых форм поддержки, но и мониторинга их эффективности [6]. Е. А. Другова, А. А. Андраханов, Л. А. Больбасова, Д. А. Коричин показывают важность сетевых и коллаборативных форм исследований для интенсификации научной деятельности и становления молодых ученых, а также влияние международных профессиональных ассоциаций на формирование исследовательских компетенций и построение академической карьеры [7]. С. Фортунато и соавторы разработали предложения, направленные на более точную оценку деятельности научных организаций, поиск новых эффективных форм финансирования и др.…”

Section: International Experience In the Integration Of Educationunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Support for Young Researchers: Foreign Practices and the Possibility of their Application in Russia

Ilina¹,

Zharova²,

Koroleva³

2020

IntegrEdu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. In the era of globalization and the development of the digital economy, the key resource for the development of the state is human resources, that is why all developed countries have engaged in competition to attract talented young researchers. The purpose of the article is to analyze successful foreign practices of countries that are leaders in innovative development (USA, China, South Korea, Great Britain, France) to support young researchers and formulate, on the basis of this analysis, recommendations for their use in Russia. Materials and Methods. The study used scientometric methods, in particular, statistical, content analysis, thesaurus, as well as graphical analysis and mathematical methods for processing structured and unstructured big data. Results. The analysis of tools for identifying and supporting young researchers from foreign countries – leaders of innovative development, including activities implemented by government, scientific foundations, universities, associations and research agencies, councils of scientific societies and other institutions is presented. A large number of support tools was considered at all stages of building a career in the field of science, from identifying talented youth to financial and social support for young doctors of science. Recommendations on expanding the range of such tools in Russian practice were formulated. Discussion and Conclusion. The study is of interest to Russian scientific foundations willing to emulate the best foreign practices, as well as to federal executive bodies in order to make effective decisions on the way of improving the system of scientific funding.

show abstract

Section: International Experience In the Integration Of Educationunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Support for Young Researchers: Foreign Practices and the Possibility of their Application in Russia

Ilina¹,

Zharova²,

Koroleva³

2020

IntegrEdu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Individual Academic Productivity vs New Managerialism in Academic Research

Ниязова

2021

umj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper considers individual academic productivity and the new managerialism in academic research as a set of social relations, common and opposite interests of a scholar and a university. The balance of interests is a necessary condition for regulating the contradictions among participants in public relations, including academic research. Reforming higher education results in new managerialism spreading wider and in scientific results paid attention to. The increasing accountability with a lack of mutual trust and information asymmetry creates the illusion of an imbalance of academic researchers’ interests in favor of management. The power potential of the new managerialism can become an instrument of both pressure and encouragement of individual academic productivity. As is shown in our review, this productivity, mainly published papers, is influenced by the principles of its assessment. The evolution of approaches to the academic results promotion provides a large variety of criteria for the selection of indicators to assess scientific activity. The game theory allows to reduce this variety to one common ground, where winning is considered to be the basis of relationships in academic research. As a result, there is a matrix model of four strategies – the extreme forms of scholar-and-management relationship manifestation within the system of academic research. Only one of these strategies means a balance of interests and long-term cooperation, the other three imply the contradiction of individual academic productivity vs the new managerialism and are short-term. The use of winning in a game as a basis and criterion of assessment for the individual academic productivity normalization contributes to opportunistic behavior neutralization. The author makes the conclusion that the type of strategy affects the combination of simple and qualitative indicators and professional expertise when assessing scientific results. It is reasonable to choose the indicators of assessment according to the most balanced strategy of regulating the contradictions among participants in academic research.

show abstract

Barriers to Academic Career Development for University Teachers

Efimova

2022

umj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Barriers to Academic Career Development for University TeachersThe relevance of the issue in the present study is determined by the fact that it is difficult to engage and retain employees (including young ones) in the academic sphere because of various career barriers, which complicate pursuing a career in higher education. The study was conducted using the method of expert interviews with 108 full-time employees of Russian universities including administration, management, academic and teaching staff. These interviews identified the key barriers to academic careers for researchers and also classified these barriers. Presented findings can be useful for HR departments of higher education institutions for building various career paths for the employees of different ages, or for identifying specific types of barriers in career development to be overcome. The results of the study are relevant for academic and teaching staff interested in career development. The prospect of further research is to conduct a quantitative analysis based on the questionnaire results received from interviewing academic and teaching staff with the use of the proposed classification of academic career barriers.

show abstract

Professional Growth of a Young Scientist: Scarce Support Resources

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Support for Young Researchers: Foreign Practices and the Possibility of their Application in Russia

Support for Young Researchers: Foreign Practices and the Possibility of their Application in Russia

Individual Academic Productivity vs New Managerialism in Academic Research

Barriers to Academic Career Development for University Teachers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About