2016
DOI: 10.19084/rca14154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produtividade e composição bromatológica de Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça sob irrigação e adubação azotada

Abstract: R e s u m oForam avaliados os efeitos de diferentes lâminas de irrigação e doses de azoto (N) sobre a produtividade, efi ciência do uso do azoto (EUN) e composição bromatológica do Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados, em esquema fatorial 2x4, com três repetições, sendo dois níveis de irrigação (50% e 80% da evaporação do Tanque Classe "A", ECA) e quatro doses de N (200, 400, 600 e 800 kg/ha/ano). As lâminas de irrigação aplicadas apresentaram comportamentos semel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilization Periods August September October November Average --------------------GDM (t ha -1 ) -------------------- Analyzing the effect of grasses alone, marandu (6.67 t ha -1 ) and Mombasa (6.82 t ha -1 ) grasses showed higher forage yields (P<0.05) (Table 1). This situation was already expected, as these grasses have a high potential for forage production, when in favorable soil and climate conditions, and annual forage production can exceed 30 tons of GDM ha -1 , as a sum of several defoliations during growth season (Magalhães, 2010;Mochel Filho et al, 2016). Although, in this experiment, the forage production was lower than the one mentioned above.…”
Section: Grassessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Utilization Periods August September October November Average --------------------GDM (t ha -1 ) -------------------- Analyzing the effect of grasses alone, marandu (6.67 t ha -1 ) and Mombasa (6.82 t ha -1 ) grasses showed higher forage yields (P<0.05) (Table 1). This situation was already expected, as these grasses have a high potential for forage production, when in favorable soil and climate conditions, and annual forage production can exceed 30 tons of GDM ha -1 , as a sum of several defoliations during growth season (Magalhães, 2010;Mochel Filho et al, 2016). Although, in this experiment, the forage production was lower than the one mentioned above.…”
Section: Grassessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The reduction in the contents of this constituent with advancing forage age is associated with the higher complexation of nitrogen compounds with the lignocellulosic fraction of the cell wall. However, even at the highest cutting age, the CP content is above the minimum of 6-8% in DM, recommended for the maintenance of 8 mg NH 3 -N.dL -1 in the rumen fluid and for the efficient ruminal degradation, with an increase in the production of microbial protein (24) ; these values are equivalent to those obtained for tropical grasses (1,5) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Reductions in the degradation rate of nitrogen fractions from 34 days can reduce the amount of ammonia nitrogen available to rumen microorganisms, which use it for the synthesis of amino acids, cell structures, and growth (25) , which negatively impacts the DM degradability (Table 2). In tropical grasses, a reduction in the protein degradation rate is expected with advancing age, associated with factors such as climate, water availability, and temperature, with the incorporation of this fraction in the less soluble components of the forage (1,13) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the climatic conditions, tropical forages present a marked seasonality of production, with forage of good nutritive value and availability in the rainy season, and forage losses in quantity and quality during the dry season. In this perspective, it is fundamental to implement management practices that allow the optimization of the forage use for increasing animal production [2,3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%