Productivity of Educational Psychologists in Educational Psychology Journals, 1991–1996

Smith, Megan L.; Locke, SG; Boisse, SJ; Gallagher, Peggy A.; Krengel, LE; Kuczek, JE; McFarland, JE; Rapoo, B; Wertheim, C

doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0961

Cited by 44 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Así pues, resulta de interés conocer y profundizar en la distribución de trabajos de los científicos de acuerdo con el tamaño de su producción escrita. Desde el análisis de la productividad, medida a través del número de publicaciones de la revista, las publicaciones de los autores, de un grupo de investigación, de las instituciones, en un país, o en un determinado número de tiempo, obtenemos el grado de crecimiento de la ciencia (Smith et al, 1998). …”

Section: -Autoresunclassified

Base de Datos de Investigación en Orientación Vocacional: Enfoque Cientimétrico

Buils

Gil-Beltrán²,

Miedes³

et al. 2017

EJREP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El estudio cientimétrico de la producción científica a través de las publicaciones periódicas de las Revistas especializadas no pueden llevarse a cabo exclusivamente con las bases de datos que actualmente existen. De ahí que el objetivo de este artículo sea presentar la Base de Datos en Investigación en Orientación Vocacional, basada en la utilización de Indicadores Cientimétricos. El diseño técnico de la misma se realiza a través de tablas dinámicas, permite una actualización inmediata de los datos, así como su exportación a otros programas de cálculo, permitiendo de esta manera que el investigador pueda ampliar su campo de estudio. Todo ello, se complementa con una Clasificación Temática de Orientación Vocacional que nos permite establecer los campos objeto de mayor investigación, así como la confección de un Glosario de 245 términos de Orientación Vocacional en tres idiomas (español-inglés-francés). Por otro lado, esta Base de Datos, se puede utilizar desde una perspectiva docente como introducción a la investigación cientimétrica. Dada la versatilidad de esta Base de Datos permite su utilización en otras áreas y campos de la Psicología.

show abstract

Section: -Autoresunclassified

Base de Datos de Investigación en Orientación Vocacional: Enfoque Cientimétrico

Buils

Gil-Beltrán²,

Miedes³

et al. 2017

EJREP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Educational psychology researchers ranked the most prolific individual scholars and universities in educational psychology using a weighted scoring system (Smith et al, 2003). They also ranked the popularity of different types of articles (e.g.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Research Performance In Other Disciplinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An insight into research performance through a citation counting analysis

Lee

et al. 2014

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior studies on academic performance predominantly concentrated on ranking universities and geographical regions using publications in selected journals. Despite general agreement on journal rankings based on the number of citations, no extant articles analyze universities or countries on the basis of citations from publications in leading hospitality and tourism journals. This paper examined the number of citations that published articles from six leading journals in hospitality and tourism received during the 10-year period from 1996 to 2005.The affiliated universities, countries/regions, and geographical continents were then ranked to determine their level of academic performance. This paper provides an alternative insight into academic performance of research universities and countries.

show abstract

“…Initially, only the Journal of Counseling Psychology was used to rate counseling psychology programs (Bohn, 1966;Cox & Catt, 1977). Subsequently, Howard (1983) and Delgado and Howard (1994), and Smith et al (2003) used different time periods and additional journals to rank counseling psychology programs. Variation was noted between studies.…”

Section: Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Delgado and Howard (1994) recommended using a 10 year time span. Smith et al (2003) noted that counseling psychologists publish their work in numerous journals rather than the five used in their ranking. A similar observation was made for science education (Barrow, Alspaugh & Mitchell, 2002).…”

Section: Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

U.S. Institutional Research Productivity in Major Science Education Research Journals: Top 30 for 2000’s

Barrow¹,

Tang²

2013

JEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

VonAalst (2010) used Google Scholar to identify the top four science education research journals: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education, International Journal of Science Education, and Journal of Science Teacher Education. U.S. institutional productivity for 2000-2009 for the above journals was the data for the study. The major domestic science education programs were identified for raw and weighted counts. For the top 10, there was a 100% agreement with different ranks while there was only a 60% agreement among the bottom 10. These results demonstrated that dominant science education faculty published their research in multiple empirical journals.Keywords: institutional/faculty productivity, science education research journals, domestic higher education institutions IntroductionThe first purpose of this study was to identify the major domestic science education programs based upon recognized research journals. VonAalst (2010) used Google Scholar and identified Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST), Science Education (SE), and International Journal of Science Education (IJSE) as the top three market shares for science education. The Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) had the next greatest number of articles published. These four journals collectively were used to establish U.S. institutional productivity. In recording data for the above journals, there were a large number of multiple authors (up to eight); therefore, a second purpose was to compare raw and weighted count to determine institutional productivity.Earlier, Barrow, Settlage and Germann (2008) used eight science education journals (JRST, SE, IJSE, JSTE, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Journal of Elementary Science Education, School Science & Mathematics, and Journal of Science Education and Technology) that publish empirical research to identify the top 30 domestic science education programs for 1990s. They reported variation in journals where research was published. There was a greater agreement between the raw and weighted counts for the top 10 than bottom 10. Related LiteratureInstitutional research is either perception (rankings based upon perceptions [e.g., U.S. News and World Report's annual ranking of best graduate schools]) or productivity (e.g., faculty members' publications). Recently, the National Research Council (2010) published an extensive U.S. graduate review, but most areas of education, including science education, were excluded. No published study based upon perceptions on science education was located; although, many science educators probably have a personal view of the dominant programs.The vast majority of U.S. institutional research studies have been productivity oriented. Three fields (library and information science, counseling psychology, and reading/literacy education) have varied objective measures over the years.Budd and colleagues (Budd & Seavey, 1996;Budd, 2000;Adkins & Budd, 2006) have conducted a series of reviews of library information and sc...

show abstract

Productivity of Educational Psychologists in Educational Psychology Journals, 1991–1996

Cited by 44 publications

References 16 publications

Base de Datos de Investigación en Orientación Vocacional: Enfoque Cientimétrico

Base de Datos de Investigación en Orientación Vocacional: Enfoque Cientimétrico

An insight into research performance through a citation counting analysis

U.S. Institutional Research Productivity in Major Science Education Research Journals: Top 30 for 2000’s

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About