2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of such systems over monocropping could be substantial if yields on agroforestry can be brought to levels comparable with monocropping systems, which the latest evidence suggests is feasible in many contexts (Beillouin et al 2021). While arable crop yields are reported to decrease in African agroforestry systems (between − 100 and − 11%) (Félix et al 2018;Staton et al 2022), there is an expanding body of evidence showing that yields in agroforestry can be comparable or only slightly lower than those in monocropping and are generally higher when harvestable produce from tree products is included in the calculation (Niether et al 2020;Castle et al 2021). Future work could thus include fodder trees in the feed biomass and land management options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of such systems over monocropping could be substantial if yields on agroforestry can be brought to levels comparable with monocropping systems, which the latest evidence suggests is feasible in many contexts (Beillouin et al 2021). While arable crop yields are reported to decrease in African agroforestry systems (between − 100 and − 11%) (Félix et al 2018;Staton et al 2022), there is an expanding body of evidence showing that yields in agroforestry can be comparable or only slightly lower than those in monocropping and are generally higher when harvestable produce from tree products is included in the calculation (Niether et al 2020;Castle et al 2021). Future work could thus include fodder trees in the feed biomass and land management options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of the fruit tree scenario may extend beyond the effect on mass-flowering arable crop pollination because fruit trees themselves are pollinator-dependent. Mass-flowering arable crops (and other nearby semi-natural habitat) could in turn enhance pollination of the (earlier flowering) fruit-trees, by providing complementary year-round floral resources for bumblebees, relative to monoculture systems (Proesmans et al, 2019;Staton et al, 2022).…”
Section: Agroforestrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the Top 10 institutions contributed with at least 45 publications or more. For the University of Reading, the most recent document is focused on productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in agroforestry versus an arable system and concluded how a diversified farming system could improve farm income, but support from grants would reduce the initial negative cash flow [ 34 ]. For Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, the most recent document is a review by Baho et al [ 35 ] on microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems by moving beyond the state-of-the-art to minimize the risk of ecological surprise.…”
Section: Ecosystem Services Pollinators and Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%