2021
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of cello‐oligosaccharides through the biorefinery concept: A technical‐economic and life‐cycle assessment

Abstract: Producers look for co-products to increase the value chain and production flexibility. With a high market aggregate value, the production of cello-oligosaccharides (COS) as functional oligosaccharides from cellulosic substrates has been investigated. As COS/cellopentaose production process are rarely described in the literature, this study estimated the cellopentaose production cost and performed a lifecycle assessment of the cellopentaose production process previously developed using sugarcane straw as a subs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barbosa et al [ 110 ] assessed the economic and environmental perspective of the co-production of cello-oligosaccharides (COS) and XOS from sugarcane straw (COS is the main product and XOS the byproduct). Regarding the capital expenditures of their most optimistic scenario, the higher fraction (78%) was related to the COS production stage, followed by the XOS production stage (12%), and sugarcane pretreatment (~10%), indicating that the costs related to XOS purification (chromatography costs) tend to be higher than the costs related to sugarcane straw pretreatment in higher scales.…”
Section: Xos In Biorefinery Platforms and Market Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbosa et al [ 110 ] assessed the economic and environmental perspective of the co-production of cello-oligosaccharides (COS) and XOS from sugarcane straw (COS is the main product and XOS the byproduct). Regarding the capital expenditures of their most optimistic scenario, the higher fraction (78%) was related to the COS production stage, followed by the XOS production stage (12%), and sugarcane pretreatment (~10%), indicating that the costs related to XOS purification (chromatography costs) tend to be higher than the costs related to sugarcane straw pretreatment in higher scales.…”
Section: Xos In Biorefinery Platforms and Market Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%