2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of 2,3-butanediol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…168 It is a fuel with a high heating value (27 000 J g − 1 ) and has been used as a liquid fuel or fuel additive.…”
Section: Biofuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…168 It is a fuel with a high heating value (27 000 J g − 1 ) and has been used as a liquid fuel or fuel additive.…”
Section: Biofuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…amounts of 2,3-BD (0.4-2.0 g/L) during wine fermentation (Ehsani et al, 2009) although S. cerevisiae possesses three putative pathways converting pyruvate to 2,3-BD (Romano and Suzzi, 1996). Metabolic engineering to produce 2,3-BD with engineered S. cerevisiae strains harboring the bacterial 2,3-BD biosynthetic pathway have been attempted (Kim et al, 2013;Ng et al, 2012). The bacterial 2,3-BD biosynthetic pathway converts pyruvate into 2,3-BD by three-step enzyme reactions: two molecules of pyruvate are condensed to produce a-acetolactate by acetolactate synthase, a-acetolactate is decarboxylated to produce acetoin by acetolactate decarboxylase, and acetoin is further reduced into 2,3-BD by butanediol dehydrogenase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bacterial species including Klebsiella pneumoniae, K. variicola, K. oxytoca, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter cloacae have been used to produce 2,3-BD with high yields through optimization of culture conditions or genetic engineering (Celinska and Grajek 2009; Kim et al 2013), but these strains are pathogenic or opportunistic pathogens and have been categorized under risk group-2 microorganisms, unsuitable for industrial-scale biotransformation (Ji et al 2011;Kim et al 2013). The microorganisms that may cause disease in humans and animals but are unlikely to be a serious hazard to laboratory personnel, the community, animals or the environment are called risk group 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%