Production Management and Engineering Sciences

Majerník, Milan; Daneshjo, Naqib; Bosak, Martin

doi:10.1201/b19259

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[54] After brainstorm and the multiple voting technique, it was considered that, from point of view of the FPI research conducted in the enterprise, it is necessary to include, in addition to the criteria indicated in the context of sustainable development, i.e., influence on natural environment, reactivity, combustibility, and also additional criteria, i.e.,: level of the sensitivity and type of washing (emulgation). The criterion of the level of penetrant sensitivity was considered as important in the framework of effective FPI research because it regulates the size of the detected defects, which makes it possible to reduce the incorrect rejection of a product or acceptance of an incompatible product, causing failure or its withdrawal [55][56][57]. In addition, the types of washing (emulgation) which generate effective FPI research (regarding such factors as, for example, costs and research time) which stood out were the washing with water, solvent and emulsifier types [34].…”

Section: Description Of the Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To conduct, in an effective way, the non-destructive testing (NDT) of products—in particular, the fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI)—remains a challenge. Therefore, the aim of this work is to propose the method of support in the choice of a fluorescent penetrant to be used in FPI research. In the results of the usage of the proposed procedure, it is demonstrated that it is possible to reduce the negative impacts on the environment by FPI processes (through sustainability), while including other criteria, i.e., financial, security, productive (Industry 4.0), and societal (Society 5.0) criteria. The essence of the proposed method is to integrate two methods of decision support. These were the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and the cost–quality analysis (AKJ). Using the AHP method, the quality level of fluorescent penetrant (to the satisfaction of the customer)—which included the sustainability criteria—are calculated. These criteria include natural environment, reactivity, combustibility, level of sensitivity, and type of washing (emulsification). Then, with the help of the AKJ, the most favorable penetrant—in terms of quality and cost—is calculated and, thus, indicated. This choice must include the concept of sustainable development. Therefore, this method can be used to choose fluorescent penetrants in manufacturing and service enterprises which carry out FPI.

show abstract

Section: Description Of the Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%